Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 243

1.

US IRBs confronting research in the developing world.

Klitzman RL.

Dev World Bioeth. 2012 Aug;12(2):63-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00324.x. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

2.

How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence.

Klitzman R.

J Med Ethics. 2013 Apr;39(4):224-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100439. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

3.

How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies.

Klitzman R.

J Med Ethics. 2014 Mar;40(3):193-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101174. Epub 2013 Mar 8.

4.

"Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest.

Klitzman R.

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022796. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

5.

Local IRBs vs. federal agencies: shifting dynamics, systems, and relationships.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Jul;7(3):50-62. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.50.

6.
7.

Linguistic and Cultural Challenges in Communication and Translation in US-Sponsored HIV Prevention Research in Emerging Economies.

Hanrahan D, Sexton P, Hui K, Teitcher J, Sugarman J, London AJ, Barnes M, Purpura J, Klitzman R.

PLoS One. 2015 Jul 30;10(7):e0133394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133394. eCollection 2015.

8.

American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.

American Society of Clinical Oncology.

J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. Epub 2003 Apr 29.

PMID:
12721281
9.

How IRBs view and make decisions about consent forms.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb;8(1):8-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.8.

10.

From anonymity to "open doors": IRB responses to tensions with researchers.

Klitzman R.

BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jul 3;5:347. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-347.

11.
12.

The ethics police?: IRBs' views concerning their power.

Klitzman R.

PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028773. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

13.

How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US.

Klitzman R.

BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Jun 23;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-13.

15.
16.

Legal and ethical values in the resolution of research-related disputes: how can IRBS respond to participant complaints?

Underhill K.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Feb;9(1):71-82. doi: 10.1525/jer.2014.9.1.71.

17.

Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards.

Mammel KA, Kaplan DW.

J Adolesc Health. 1995 Nov;17(5):323-30.

PMID:
8924437
18.

How IRBs view and make decisions about social risks.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Jul;8(3):58-65. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.3.58.

19.
20.

Harmonizing regulations for biomedical research: a critical analysis of the US and Venezuelan systems.

Di Tillio-Gonzalez D, Fischbach RL.

Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):167-77. Epub 2006 Oct 13.

PMID:
17488491

Supplemental Content

Support Center