Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 82

1.

Life Sciences and Related Fields: Trends Relevant to the Biological Weapons Convention.

National Research Council (US) Committee on Trends in Science and Technology Relevant to the Biological Weapons Convention: An International Workshop.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.

2.

A Survey of Attitudes and Actions on Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences: A Collaborative Effort of the National Research Council and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

National Research Council (US) Committee on Assessing Fundamental Attitudes of Life Scientists as a Basis for Biosecurity Education.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009.

3.

Evidence Brief: The Effectiveness Of Mandatory Computer-Based Trainings On Government Ethics, Workplace Harassment, Or Privacy And Information Security-Related Topics.

Peterson K, McCleery E.

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2014 May.

4.

Code of Conduct on Biosecurity for Biological Resource Centres: procedural implementation.

Rohde C, Smith D, Martin D, Fritze D, Stalpers J.

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Jul;63(Pt 7):2374-82. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.051961-0. Epub 2013 May 10.

PMID:
23667143
5.

Trust and Confidence at the Interfaces of the Life Sciences and Society: Does the Public Trust Science? A Workshop Summary.

Roundtable on Public Interfaces of the Life Sciences, Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015 Sep 23.

6.

Responsible conduct by life scientists in an age of terrorism.

Atlas RM.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Sep;15(3):293-301. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9124-7. Epub 2009 May 7.

PMID:
19421897
7.

How can scientists bring research to use: the HENVINET experience.

Bartonova A.

Environ Health. 2012 Jun 28;11 Suppl 1:S2. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S2.

8.

Toward the realization of a better aged society: messages from gerontology and geriatrics.

Arai H, Ouchi Y, Yokode M, Ito H, Uematsu H, Eto F, Oshima S, Ota K, Saito Y, Sasaki H, Tsubota K, Fukuyama H, Honda Y, Iguchi A, Toba K, Hosoi T, Kita T; Members of Subcommittee for Aging.

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012 Jan;12(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00776.x. Review.

PMID:
22188494
9.

A code of ethics for the life sciences.

Jones NL.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar;13(1):25-43.

PMID:
17703607
10.

Palliative and end-of-life care in prisons: a content analysis of the literature.

Maschi T, Marmo S, Han J.

Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(3):172-97. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-05-2013-0024. Review.

PMID:
25764177
11.

Science and Security in a Post 9/11 World: A Report Based on Regional Discussions Between the Science and Security Communities.

National Research Council (US) Committee on a New Government-University Partnership for Science and Security.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2007.

12.

[Telecommunications, health and radiology: potential synergies for the new millennium].

Lagalla R.

Radiol Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;102(1-2):14-9. Italian.

PMID:
11677432
13.

Social and Behavioral Sciences for National Security: Proceedings of a Summit.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2017 May 24.

14.

Perspectives on Research with H5N1 Avian Influenza: Scientific Inquiry, Communication, Controversy: Summary of a Workshop.

Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, Policy and Global Affairs, Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Forum on Microbial Threats, Board on Global Health, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 Apr 4.

15.
16.

Preventing biological weapon development through the governance of life science research.

Epstein GL.

Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Mar;10(1):17-37. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2011.0091. Review.

PMID:
22455676
17.
18.

The concept of governance in dual-use research.

Dubov A.

Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Aug;17(3):447-57. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9542-9.

PMID:
24442981
19.

Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.

Subotnik RF, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Worrell FC.

Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2011 Jan;12(1):3-54. doi: 10.1177/1529100611418056.

PMID:
26168418
20.

Possibilities, intentions and threats: dual use in the life sciences reconsidered.

van der Bruggen K.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Dec;18(4):741-56. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9266-2. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

Supplemental Content

Support Center