Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 111

1.

Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal pathology.

Ameye L, Timmerman D, Valentin L, Paladini D, Zhang J, Van Holsbeke C, Lissoni AA, Savelli L, Veldman J, Testa AC, Amant F, Van Huffel S, Bourne T.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;40(5):582-91. doi: 10.1002/uog.11177.

2.

Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group.

Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D, Epstein E, Melis GB, Guerriero S, Van Holsbeke C, Savelli L, Fruscio R, Lissoni AA, Testa AC, Veldman J, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Bourne T, Valentin L.

BMJ. 2010 Dec 14;341:c6839. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6839.

3.

Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.

Di Legge A, Testa AC, Ameye L, Van Calster B, Lissoni AA, Leone FP, Savelli L, Franchi D, Czekierdowski A, Trio D, Van Holsbeke C, Ferrazzi E, Scambia G, Timmerman D, Valentin L.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;40(3):345-54. doi: 10.1002/uog.11167. Epub 2012 Aug 7.

4.

Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Meys EM, Kaijser J, Kruitwagen RF, Slangen BF, Van Calster B, Aertgeerts B, Verbakel JY, Timmerman D, Van Gorp T.

Eur J Cancer. 2016 May;58:17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 27. Review.

PMID:
26922169
5.

Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.

Valentin L, Ameye L, Savelli L, Fruscio R, Leone FP, Czekierdowski A, Lissoni AA, Fischerova D, Guerriero S, Van Holsbeke C, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):456-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.9030. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

7.

Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.

Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa AC, Guerriero S, Fischerova D, Lissoni AA, Van Holsbeke C, Fruscio R, Czekierdowski A, Jurkovic D, Savelli L, Vergote I, Bourne T, Van Huffel S, Valentin L.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;36(2):226-34. doi: 10.1002/uog.7636.

8.

Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies.

Kaijser J, Bourne T, Valentin L, Sayasneh A, Van Holsbeke C, Vergote I, Testa AC, Franchi D, Van Calster B, Timmerman D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;41(1):9-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.12323. Review.

9.

Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training.

Sayasneh A, Wynants L, Preisler J, Kaijser J, Johnson S, Stalder C, Husicka R, Abdallah Y, Raslan F, Drought A, Smith AA, Ghaem-Maghami S, Epstein E, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T.

Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 25;108(12):2448-54. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.224. Epub 2013 May 14.

10.

Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.

Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa A, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Froyman W, Wynants L, Van Holsbeke C, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kaijser J, Czekierdowski A, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Leone FP, Rossi A, Landolfo C, Vergote I, Bourne T, Valentin L.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):424-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

PMID:
26800772
11.

A multicenter prospective external validation of the diagnostic performance of IOTA simple descriptors and rules to characterize ovarian masses.

Sayasneh A, Kaijser J, Preisler J, Johnson S, Stalder C, Husicka R, Guha S, Naji O, Abdallah Y, Raslan F, Drought A, Smith AA, Fotopoulou C, Ghaem-Maghami S, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T.

Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul;130(1):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

PMID:
23578539
12.

Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kaijser J, Sayasneh A, Van Hoorde K, Ghaem-Maghami S, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Van Calster B.

Hum Reprod Update. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):449-62. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt059. Epub 2013 Dec 9. Review.

PMID:
24327552
13.

Improving the preoperative classification of adnexal masses as benign or malignant by second-stage tests.

Daemen A, Valentin L, Fruscio R, Van Holsbeke C, Melis GB, Guerriero S, Czekierdowski A, Jurkovic D, Ombelet W, Rossi A, Vergote I, Bourne T, De Moor B, Timmerman D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):100-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.8813.

14.

Estimating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: an external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.

Meys EM, Jeelof LS, Achten NM, Slangen BF, Lambrechts S, Kruitwagen RF, Van Gorp T.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug 12. doi: 10.1002/uog.17225. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
27514486
15.

Strategies to diagnose ovarian cancer: new evidence from phase 3 of the multicentre international IOTA study.

Testa A, Kaijser J, Wynants L, Fischerova D, Van Holsbeke C, Franchi D, Savelli L, Epstein E, Czekierdowski A, Guerriero S, Fruscio R, Leone FP, Vergote I, Bourne T, Valentin L, Van Calster B, Timmerman D.

Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 12;111(4):680-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.333. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

16.

IOTA simple rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: prospective external validation.

Alcázar JL, Pascual MÁ, Olartecoechea B, Graupera B, Aubá M, Ajossa S, Hereter L, Julve R, Gastón B, Peddes C, Sedda F, Piras A, Saba L, Guerriero S.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;42(4):467-71. doi: 10.1002/uog.12485. Epub 2013 Sep 2.

17.

The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.

Knafel A, Banas T, Nocun A, Wiechec M, Jach R, Ludwin A, Kabzinska-Turek M, Pietrus M, Pitynski K.

Ultraschall Med. 2016 Oct;37(5):516-523. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

PMID:
26126150
18.

Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.

Ruiz de Gauna B, Rodriguez D, Olartecoechea B, Aubá M, Jurado M, Gómez Roig MD, Alcázar JL.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Aug;191:10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 30.

PMID:
26066289
19.

Accuracy of ultrasonography performed by examiners with varied training and experience in predicting specific pathology of adnexal masses.

Sayasneh A, Kaijser J, Preisler J, Smith AA, Raslan F, Johnson S, Husicka R, Ferrara L, Stalder C, Ghaem-Maghami S, Timmerman D, Bourne T.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;45(5):605-12. doi: 10.1002/uog.14675. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

20.

Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.

Ruiz de Gauna B, Sanchez P, Pineda L, Utrilla-Layna J, Juez L, Alcázar JL.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):95-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.13254. Epub 2014 May 21.

Supplemental Content

Support Center