Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 221

1.

Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.

Breman A, Pursley AN, Hixson P, Bi W, Ward P, Bacino CA, Shaw C, Lupski JR, Beaudet A, Patel A, Cheung SW, Van den Veyver I.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):351-61. doi: 10.1002/pd.3861. Review.

PMID:
22467166
2.

[Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and comparison of chromosomal abnormality rate during second trimester].

Zhang YP, Wu JP, Li XT, Lei CX, Xu JZ, Yin M.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;46(9):644-8. Chinese.

PMID:
22176986
3.

[Diagnosis of aneuploidy with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); value in pregnancies with increased risk for chromosome aberrations].

Ulmer R, Pfeiffer RA, Kollert A, Beinder E.

Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2000 Jan-Feb;204(1):1-7. German.

PMID:
10721179
4.

Prenatal BACs-on-Beads™: the prospective experience of five prenatal diagnosis laboratories.

Vialard F, Simoni G, Gomes DM, Abourra A, De Toffol S, Bru F, Martinez Romero MC, Nitsch L, Bouhanna P, Marcato L, Popowski T, Grimi B, Martínez-Conejero JA, Benzacken B, Genesio R, Grati FR.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):329-35. doi: 10.1002/pd.2934.

PMID:
22467163
5.

Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis in Spain: analysis and evaluation of the results obtained from amniotic fluid samples during the last decade.

Mademont-Soler I, Morales C, Clusellas N, Soler A, Sánchez A; Group of Cytogenetics from Hospital Clínic de Barcelona.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug;157(2):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

PMID:
21492994
6.

[Chorionic villus needle sampling by the transabdominal route or by placental centesis. A series of 930 cases].

Guidicelli B, Levy A, Piquet C, Gamerre M.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1993;22(8):851-5. French.

PMID:
8132961
7.

Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.

Fiorentino F, Caiazzo F, Napolitano S, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Sessa M, Nuccitelli A, Biricik A, Gordon A, Rizzo G, Baldi M.

Prenat Diagn. 2011 Dec;31(13):1270-82. doi: 10.1002/pd.2884. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

PMID:
22034057
8.

Genomic medicine in prenatal diagnosis.

South ST, Chen Z, Brothman AR.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;51(1):62-73. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181616509. Review.

PMID:
18303500
9.

Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis study of 2782 cases of high-risk pregnant women.

Zhang L, Zhang XH, Liang MY, Ren MH.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Feb 20;123(4):423-30.

PMID:
20193481
10.

First-trimester prenatal diagnosis performed on pregnant women with fetal ultrasound abnormalities: the reliability of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on mesenchymal core for the main aneuploidies.

Toutain J, Epiney M, Begorre M, Dessuant H, Vandenbossche F, Horovitz J, Saura R.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Apr;149(2):143-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

PMID:
20045588
11.

Dual testing with QF-PCR and karyotype analysis for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Evaluation of 13,500 cases with consideration of using QF-PCR as a stand-alone test according to referral indications.

Papoulidis I, Siomou E, Sotiriadis A, Efstathiou G, Psara A, Sevastopoulou E, Anastasakis E, Sifakis S, Tsiligianni T, Kontodiou M, Malamaki C, Tzimina M, Petersen MB, Manolakos E, Athanasiadis A.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Jul;32(7):680-5. doi: 10.1002/pd.3888. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

PMID:
22513450
12.

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings: evaluation of chromosomal microarray-based analysis.

Mademont-Soler I, Morales C, Soler A, Martínez-Crespo JM, Shen Y, Margarit E, Clusellas N, Obón M, Wu BL, Sánchez A.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):375-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.12372. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

13.

QF-PCR: application, overview and review of the literature.

Mann K, Ogilvie CM.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):309-14. doi: 10.1002/pd.2945. Review.

PMID:
22467160
14.

An assessment of the use of interphase FISH with chromosome specific probes as an alternative to cytogenetics in prenatal diagnosis.

Thein AT, Abdel-Fattah SA, Kyle PM, Soothill PW.

Prenat Diagn. 2000 Apr;20(4):275-80.

PMID:
10740198
15.

Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Fiorentino F, Napoletano S, Caiazzo F, Sessa M, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Gordon A, Nuccitelli A, Rizzo G, Baldi M.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jul;21(7):725-30. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.253. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

16.

Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray.

Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb AN, Torchia BS, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG.

Prenat Diagn. 2009 Dec;29(12):1156-66. doi: 10.1002/pd.2371.

PMID:
19795450
17.

Defining the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization on uncultured amniocytes for prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies.

D'Alton ME, Malone FD, Chelmow D, Ward BE, Bianchi DW.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;176(4):769-74; discussion 774-6.

PMID:
9125600
18.

Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping.

Stojilkovic-Mikic T, Mann K, Docherty Z, Mackie Ogilvie C.

Prenat Diagn. 2005 Jan;25(1):79-83.

PMID:
15662689
19.

Clinical and cytogenetic results of a series of amniocentesis cases from Northeast China: a report of 2500 cases.

An N, Li LL, Wang RX, Li LL, Yue JM, Liu RZ.

Genet Mol Res. 2015 Dec 2;14(4):15660-7. doi: 10.4238/2015.December.1.18.

20.

[FREQUENCIES OF FETAL CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS DETECTED BY AMNIOCENTESIS: OUR 15-YEARS EXPERIENCE].

Stoyanova V, Ivanov H, Linev A, Vachev T.

Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2015;54(5):13-8. Bulgarian.

PMID:
26411190

Supplemental Content

Support Center