Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 112

1.

Comparison of digital flat-panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose-area products.

Wiesinger B, Stütz A, Schmehl J, Claussen CD, Wiskirchen J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Apr;198(4):946-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7245.

PMID:
22451565
2.

Comparison of visibility for four self-expanding nitinol bare stents in vitro.

Wiesinger B, Stütz A, Schmehl J, Groezinger G, Claussen CD, Wiskirchen J.

Acta Radiol. 2012 Nov 1;53(9):1020-5. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120187. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

PMID:
22969090
3.

Radiopacity of current endovascular stents: evaluation in a multiple reader phantom study.

Wiskirchen J, Kraemer K, König C, Kramer U, Trübenbach J, Wersebe A, Tepe G, Dietz K, Claussen CD, Duda SH.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Aug;15(8):843-52.

PMID:
15297588
4.

Difference in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector in peripheral angiography and the effect of BMI.

Wiesinger B, Kirchner S, Blumenstock G, Herz K, Schmehl J, Claussen CD, Wiskirchen J.

Rofo. 2013 Feb;185(2):153-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1330276. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

PMID:
23196837
5.

Therapeutic angiographic procedures: differences in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector.

Spira D, Kirchner S, Blumenstock G, Herz K, Ketelsen D, Wiskirchen J, Wiesinger B.

Acta Radiol. 2016 May;57(5):587-94. doi: 10.1177/0284185115597262. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

PMID:
26231951
6.

Radiopaque markers in endovascular stents--benefit and potential hazards.

Wiskirchen J, Venugopalan R, Holton AD, König C, Kramer U, Trübenbach J, Tepe G, Claussen CD, Duda SH.

Rofo. 2003 Apr;175(4):484-8.

PMID:
12677502
7.
8.

Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study.

Mesbahi A, Mehnati P, Keshtkar A, Aslanabadi N.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;131(3):399-403. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn188. Epub 2008 Jul 11.

PMID:
18621917
9.

Spatial resolution limits of multislice computed tomography (MS-CT), C-arm-CT, and flat panel-CT (FP-CT) compared to MicroCT for visualization of a small metallic stent.

Ionescu M, Metcalfe RW, Cody D, Alvarado MV, Hipp J, Benndorf G.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Jul;18(7):866-75. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.012.

PMID:
21669352
10.

Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.

Davies AG, Cowen AR, Kengyelics SM, Moore J, Sivananthan MU.

Eur Radiol. 2007 Jul;17(7):1787-94. Epub 2006 Nov 18. Erratum in: Eur Radiol. 2007 Jul;17(7):1913.

PMID:
17115166
12.

Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: optimization of the radiation dose to the patient using a flat-panel detector angiographic suite.

Sapoval M, Pellerin O, Rehel JL, Houdoux N, Rahmoune G, Aubert B, Fitton I.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Oct;33(5):949-54. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9795-0. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

PMID:
20094719
13.

CT and MR imaging of nitinol stents with radiopaque distal markers.

Létourneau-Guillon L, Soulez G, Beaudoin G, Oliva VL, Giroux MF, Qin Z, Boussion N, Therasse E, De Guise J, Cloutier G.

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Jun;15(6):615-24.

PMID:
15178723
14.

Intracranial 2D and 3D DSA with flat panel detector of the direct conversion type: initial experience.

Hatakeyama Y, Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Ohnari N, Moriya J, Oda N, Nishino K, Miyamoto W.

Eur Radiol. 2006 Nov;16(11):2594-602. Epub 2006 May 18.

PMID:
16708219
15.

Evaluation of the microangiographic fluoroscope (MAF) using generalized system performance metrics.

Jain A, Bednarek DR, Rudin S.

Med Phys. 2013 Mar;40(3):031915. doi: 10.1118/1.4792460.

16.

Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.

Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Kollaros N, Kyriakidis Z, Neofotistou V.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):93-6. Epub 2006 Feb 3.

PMID:
16461500
17.

[In vitro examination of the visibility of 11 stent catheters with real-time MR imaging].

Zorger N, Pätzel C, Hamer OW, Lenhart M, Völk M, Herold T, Feuerbach S, Nitz WR.

Rofo. 2004 Sep;176(9):1311-8. German.

PMID:
15346267
18.

Risk factors of radiation dose in patients undergoing peripherally-inserted central catheter procedure using conventional angiography equipment and flat panel detector-based mobile C-arm fluoroscopy.

Lee T, Shin SW, Choi D, Cho SK, Hyun D, Do YS, Jeon S, Cha B, Bok EK, Kim S.

Acta Radiol. 2014 Dec;55(10):1234-8. doi: 10.1177/0284185113514221. Epub 2013 Nov 29.

PMID:
24292900
19.

Evaluation of stent visibility by flat panel detector CT in patients treated for intracranial aneurysms.

Clarençon F, Piotin M, Pistocchi S, Babic D, Blanc R.

Neuroradiology. 2012 Oct;54(10):1121-5. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-1002-8. Epub 2012 Feb 4.

PMID:
22307271
20.

Flat panel detector computed tomography for the interaction between contrast-enhanced thrombi and stent retrievers in stroke therapy: a pilot study.

Wenger KJ, Berkefeld J, Wagner M.

Clin Neuroradiol. 2014 Sep;24(3):251-4. doi: 10.1007/s00062-013-0246-6. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

PMID:
23949606

Supplemental Content

Support Center