Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Observer agreement comparing the use of virtual slides with glass slides in the pathology review component of the POSH breast cancer cohort study.

Shaw EC, Hanby AM, Wheeler K, Shaaban AM, Poller D, Barton S, Treanor D, Fulford L, Walker RA, Ryan D, Lakhani SR, Wells CA, Roche H, Theaker JM, Ellis IO, Jones JL, Eccles DM.

J Clin Pathol. 2012 May;65(5):403-8. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200369. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

PMID:
22447915
2.

Development and evaluation of the virtual pathology slide: a new tool in telepathology.

Costello SS, Johnston DJ, Dervan PA, O'Shea DG.

J Med Internet Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;5(2):e11.

3.

Virtual slide telepathology enables an innovative telehealth rapid breast care clinic.

López AM, Graham AR, Barker GP, Richter LC, Krupinski EA, Lian F, Grasso LL, Miller A, Kreykes LN, Henderson JT, Bhattacharyya AK, Weinstein RS.

Hum Pathol. 2009 Aug;40(8):1082-91. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 Jun 23.

PMID:
19552938
4.

Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.

Graham AR, Bhattacharyya AK, Scott KM, Lian F, Grasso LL, Richter LC, Carpenter JB, Chiang S, Henderson JT, Lopez AM, Barker GP, Weinstein RS.

Hum Pathol. 2009 Aug;40(8):1129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19540562
5.

Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.

Camparo P, Egevad L, Algaba F, Berney DM, Boccon-Gibod L, Compérat E, Evans AJ, Grobholz R, Kristiansen G, Langner C, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Oliveira P, Vainer B, Varma M.

APMIS. 2012 Apr;120(4):298-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2011.02872.x. Review.

PMID:
22429212
6.

Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Thrall MJ, Wimmer JL, Schwartz MR.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 May;139(5):656-64. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0073-OA.

PMID:
25927149
7.

An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study.

Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, Barker G, Scott KM, Richter L, Krupinski EA, Bhattacharyya AK, Davis JR, Graham AR, Rennels M, Russum WC, Goodall JF, Zhou P, Olszak AG, Williams BH, Wyant JC, Bartels PH.

Hum Pathol. 2004 Nov;35(11):1303-14.

PMID:
15668886
8.

Evaluation of the use of digital images for a national prostate core external quality assurance scheme.

Harnden P, Coleman D, Moss S, Kodikara S, Griffin NR, Melia J.

Histopathology. 2011 Oct;59(4):703-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03987.x.

PMID:
22014051
9.

Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining using whole-slide imaging for HER2 scoring of breast cancer in comparison with real glass slides.

Kondo Y, Iijima T, Noguchi M.

Pathol Int. 2012 Sep;62(9):592-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2012.02847.x.

PMID:
22924845
10.

Diagnosis of major cancer resection specimens with virtual slides: impact of a novel digital pathology workstation.

Randell R, Ruddle RA, Thomas RG, Mello-Thoms C, Treanor D.

Hum Pathol. 2014 Oct;45(10):2101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

PMID:
25128229
11.

Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience.

Krupinski EA, Tillack AA, Richter L, Henderson JT, Bhattacharyya AK, Scott KM, Graham AR, Descour MR, Davis JR, Weinstein RS.

Hum Pathol. 2006 Dec;37(12):1543-56.

PMID:
17129792
12.

A feasibility study of virtual slides in surgical pathology in China.

Li X, Liu J, Xu H, Gong E, McNutt MA, Li F, Anderson VM, Gu J.

Hum Pathol. 2007 Dec;38(12):1842-8. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

PMID:
17868776
13.

Interobserver agreement in grading of colorectal cancers-findings from a nationwide web-based survey of histopathologists.

Chandler I, Houlston RS.

Histopathology. 2008 Mar;52(4):494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.02976.x.

PMID:
18315602
14.

Superiority of virtual microscopy versus light microscopy in transplantation pathology.

Ozluk Y, Blanco PL, Mengel M, Solez K, Halloran PF, Sis B.

Clin Transplant. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):336-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01506.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

PMID:
21955102
15.

Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies.

Jen KY, Olson JL, Brodsky S, Zhou XJ, Nadasdy T, Laszik ZG.

Hum Pathol. 2013 May;44(5):888-94. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

PMID:
23199528
16.
17.

Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.

Helin H, Lundin M, Lundin J, Martikainen P, Tammela T, Helin H, van der Kwast T, Isola J.

Hum Pathol. 2005 Apr;36(4):381-6.

PMID:
15891999
18.

Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations.

Wilbur DC, Madi K, Colvin RB, Duncan LM, Faquin WC, Ferry JA, Frosch MP, Houser SL, Kradin RL, Lauwers GY, Louis DN, Mark EJ, Mino-Kenudson M, Misdraji J, Nielsen GP, Pitman MB, Rosenberg AE, Smith RN, Sohani AR, Stone JR, Tambouret RH, Wu CL, Young RH, Zembowicz A, Klietmann W.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 Dec;133(12):1949-53. doi: 10.1043/1543-2165-133.12.1949.

19.

Validating whole-slide imaging for consultation diagnoses in surgical pathology.

Bauer TW, Slaw RJ.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Nov;138(11):1459-65. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0541-OA. Epub 2014 May 19.

PMID:
24840034
20.

Digital slides: present status of a tool for consultation, teaching, and quality control in pathology.

Rocha R, Vassallo J, Soares F, Miller K, Gobbi H.

Pathol Res Pract. 2009;205(11):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 7. Review.

PMID:
19501988

Supplemental Content

Support Center