Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 147

1.

Crowding follows the binding of relative position and orientation.

Greenwood JA, Bex PJ, Dakin SC.

J Vis. 2012 Mar 21;12(3). pii: 18. doi: 10.1167/12.3.18.

2.

Probabilistic, positional averaging predicts object-level crowding effects with letter-like stimuli.

Dakin SC, Cass J, Greenwood JA, Bex PJ.

J Vis. 2010 Aug 1;10(10):14. doi: 10.1167/10.10.14.

PMID:
20884479
3.

Whole report uncovers correctly identified but incorrectly placed target information under visual crowding.

Zhang JY, Zhang GL, Liu L, Yu C.

J Vis. 2012 Jul 10;12(7). pii: 5. doi: 10.1167/12.7.5.

PMID:
22782439
4.

When crowding meets binocular rivalry: challenges for object perception.

Kim S, Shin E, Chong SC.

Vision Res. 2013 Jan 14;76:134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.10.020. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

5.

Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli.

Greenwood JA, Bex PJ, Dakin SC.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13130-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901352106. Epub 2009 Jul 16.

6.

How do flankers' relations affect crowding?

Livne T, Sagi D.

J Vis. 2010 Mar 23;10(3):1.1-14. doi: 10.1167/10.3.1.

PMID:
20377278
7.

Crowding with detection and coarse discrimination of simple visual features.

P├Áder E.

J Vis. 2008 Apr 24;8(4):24.1-6. doi: 10.1167/8.4.24.

PMID:
18484863
8.

Orientation-crowding within contours.

Glen JC, Dakin SC.

J Vis. 2013 Jul 15;13(8). pii: 14. doi: 10.1167/13.8.14.

PMID:
23857951
9.

The effect of spacing regularity on visual crowding.

Saarela TP, Westheimer G, Herzog MH.

J Vis. 2010 Aug 18;10(10):17. doi: 10.1167/10.10.17.

PMID:
20884482
10.

Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Ester EF, Zilber E, Serences JT.

J Vis. 2015 Jan 8;15(1):15.1.4. doi: 10.1167/15.1.4.

11.

Object crowding.

Wallace JM, Tjan BS.

J Vis. 2011 May 25;11(6). pii: 19. doi: 10.1167/11.6.19.

12.

The role of crowding in contextual influences on contour integration.

Robol V, Casco C, Dakin SC.

J Vis. 2012 Jul 9;12(7):3. doi: 10.1167/12.7.3.

PMID:
22776847
13.

Configuration specificity of crowding in peripheral vision.

Yeotikar NS, Khuu SK, Asper LJ, Suttle CM.

Vision Res. 2011 Jun 1;51(11):1239-48. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

14.

Appearance changes and error characteristics in crowding revealed by drawings.

Sayim B, Wagemans J.

J Vis. 2017 Sep 1;17(11):8. doi: 10.1167/17.11.8.

PMID:
28973561
15.

Multiple levels of orientation anisotropy in crowding with Gabor flankers.

Livne T, Sagi D.

J Vis. 2011 Nov 18;11(13):18. doi: 10.1167/11.13.18.

PMID:
22101017
16.

Crowding is reduced by onset transients in the target object (but not in the flankers).

Greenwood JA, Sayim B, Cavanagh P.

J Vis. 2014 Aug 1;14(6):2. doi: 10.1167/14.6.2.

PMID:
25086085
17.

Illusory contour formation survives crowding.

Lau JS, Cheung SH.

J Vis. 2012 Jun 12;12(6):15. doi: 10.1167/12.6.15.

PMID:
22693333
18.

The same binding in contour integration and crowding.

Chakravarthi R, Pelli DG.

J Vis. 2011 Jul 14;11(8). pii: 10. doi: 10.1167/11.8.10.

19.

Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding.

Manassi M, Sayim B, Herzog MH.

J Vis. 2012 Sep 26;12(10):13. doi: 10.1167/12.10.13. Print 2012. Erratum in: J Vis. 2012;12(13). doi:10.1167/12.13.2.

PMID:
23019118
20.

Visual discrimination of orientation statistics in crowded and uncrowded arrays.

Solomon JA.

J Vis. 2010 Dec 16;10(14):19. doi: 10.1167/10.14.19. Erratum in: J Vis. 2011;11(8). doi:10.1167/11.8.3.

PMID:
21163954

Supplemental Content

Support Center