Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 215

1.

New phenotypes for new breeding goals in dairy cattle.

Boichard D, Brochard M.

Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):544-50. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000018. Review.

PMID:
22436268
2.

Invited review: overview of new traits and phenotyping strategies in dairy cattle with a focus on functional traits.

Egger-Danner C, Cole JB, Pryce JE, Gengler N, Heringstad B, Bradley A, Stock KF.

Animal. 2015 Feb;9(2):191-207. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114002614. Epub 2014 Nov 12. Review.

3.

Invited review: Current state of genetic improvement in dairy sheep.

Carta A, Casu S, Salaris S.

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Dec;92(12):5814-33. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2479.

PMID:
19923587
4.

New phenotypes for new breeding goals in pigs.

Merks JW, Mathur PK, Knol EF.

Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):535-43. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111002266. Review.

PMID:
22436267
5.
6.

Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection.

Haas Yd, Windig JJ, Calus MP, Dijkstra J, Haan Md, Bannink A, Veerkamp RF.

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Dec;94(12):6122-34. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4439.

PMID:
22118100
7.

Genomic selection using indicator traits to reduce the environmental impact of milk production.

Axelsson HH, Fikse WF, Kargo M, Sørensen AC, Johansson K, Rydhmer L.

J Dairy Sci. 2013 Aug;96(8):5306-14. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6041. Epub 2013 May 30.

PMID:
23726422
8.
9.

A method to define breeding goals for sustainable dairy cattle production.

Nielsen HM, Christensen LG, Odegård J.

J Dairy Sci. 2006 Sep;89(9):3615-25.

PMID:
16899697
10.

Derivation of sustainable breeding goals for dairy cattle using selection index theory.

Nielsen HM, Christensen LG, Groen AF.

J Dairy Sci. 2005 May;88(5):1882-90.

PMID:
15829683
11.

Genetic improvement of dairy cow reproductive performance.

Berglund B.

Reprod Domest Anim. 2008 Jul;43 Suppl 2:89-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01147.x. Review.

PMID:
18638109
12.

Genomic selection for feed efficiency in dairy cattle.

Pryce JE, Wales WJ, de Haas Y, Veerkamp RF, Hayes BJ.

Animal. 2014 Jan;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113001687. Epub 2013 Oct 16. Review.

PMID:
24128704
13.

Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.

Pimentel EC, König S.

J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;90(10):3418-26. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-5005. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

14.

Turning science on robust cattle into improved genetic selection decisions.

Amer PR.

Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):551-6. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111002576. Review.

PMID:
22436269
15.

Invited review: New perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows.

Chagas LM, Bass JJ, Blache D, Burke CR, Kay JK, Lindsay DR, Lucy MC, Martin GB, Meier S, Rhodes FM, Roche JR, Thatcher WW, Webb R.

J Dairy Sci. 2007 Sep;90(9):4022-32. Review.

PMID:
17699018
16.

Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.

König S, Swalve HH.

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):5292-303. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2232.

PMID:
19762847
17.

Genetic correlation of longevity with growth, post-mortem, docility and some morphological traits in the Pirenaica beef cattle breed.

Varona L, Moreno C, Altarriba J.

Animal. 2012 Jun;6(6):873-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111002072.

PMID:
22558956
18.

Major advances in determining appropriate selection goals.

Shook GE.

J Dairy Sci. 2006 Apr;89(4):1349-61. Review.

PMID:
16537966
19.

Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.

Calus MP, de Haas Y, Pszczola M, Veerkamp RF.

Animal. 2013 Feb;7(2):183-91. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001450. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

PMID:
23031684
20.

Variation in residual feed intake in Holstein-Friesian dairy heifers in southern Australia.

Williams YJ, Pryce JE, Grainger C, Wales WJ, Linden N, Porker M, Hayes BJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Sep;94(9):4715-25. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4015.

PMID:
21854946

Supplemental Content

Support Center