Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 67

1.

Influences on the uptake of diabetes screening: a qualitative study in primary care.

Eborall H, Stone M, Aujla N, Taub N, Davies M, Khunti K.

Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Mar;62(596):e204-11. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X630106. Erratum in: Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Dec;62(605):629.

2.

Identifying people with type 2 diabetes and those at risk: lessons from the measure your waist (MY-WAIST) mixed-methods study in UK primary care.

Aujla N, Stone MA, Taub N, Davies MJ, Khunti K.

Prim Care Diabetes. 2013 Dec;7(4):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

PMID:
24021479
3.

Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.

Marteau TM, Mann E, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC, Kellar I, Sanderson S, Parker M, Griffin S, Sutton S, Kinmonth AL.

BMJ. 2010 May 13;340:c2138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2138.

4.
5.

Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.

Mann E, Prevost AT, Griffin S, Kellar I, Sutton S, Parker M, Sanderson S, Kinmonth AL, Marteau TM.

BMC Public Health. 2009 Feb 20;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-63.

6.

Patient explanations for non-attendance at structured diabetes education sessions for newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.

Winkley K, Evwierhoma C, Amiel SA, Lempp HK, Ismail K, Forbes A.

Diabet Med. 2015 Jan;32(1):120-8. doi: 10.1111/dme.12556. Epub 2014 Aug 26.

PMID:
25081181
7.

Low attendance at structured education for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: General practice characteristics and individual patient factors predict uptake.

Winkley K, Stahl D, Chamley M, Stopford R, Boughdady M, Thomas S, Amiel SA, Forbes A, Ismail K.

Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jan;99(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

PMID:
26319362
8.

A randomized evaluation of loss and gain frames in an invitation to screening for type 2 diabetes: effects on attendance, anxiety and self-rated health.

Park P, Simmons RK, Prevost AT, Griffin SJ; ADDITION Cambridge study group.

J Health Psychol. 2010 Mar;15(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/1359105309344896.

PMID:
20207663
9.

Screening for type 2 diabetes and population mortality over 10 years (ADDITION-Cambridge): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Simmons RK, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Sharp SJ, Sargeant LA, Williams KM, Prevost AT, Kinmonth AL, Wareham NJ, Griffin SJ.

Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1741-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61422-6. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

10.

Socioeconomic factors related to attendance at a Type 2 diabetes screening programme.

Dalsgaard EM, Lauritzen T, Christiansen T, Mai KS, Borch-Johnsen K, Sandbaek A.

Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):518-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02715.x.

PMID:
19646192
11.

Record-based, stepwise screening for type 2 diabetes integrated into an annual cardiovascular care review system: Findings from a UK general practice.

Fisher BG, Ang YL, Goodhart C, Simmons RK.

Prim Care Diabetes. 2011 Dec;5(4):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 2.

PMID:
21968319
12.

Waist circumference measurement: knowledge, attitudes and barriers in patients and practitioners in a multi-ethnic population.

Dunkley AJ, Stone MA, Patel N, Davies MJ, Khunti K.

Fam Pract. 2009 Oct;26(5):365-71. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp048. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

PMID:
19589884
13.

Screening for type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes in general practice: a descriptive study of Maltese practices.

Grech M, Chaney D.

Prim Care Diabetes. 2014 Oct;8(3):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 18.

PMID:
24444830
14.

Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.

Christie D, Thompson R, Sawtell M, Allen E, Cairns J, Smith F, Jamieson E, Hargreaves K, Ingold A, Brooks L, Wiggins M, Oliver S, Jones R, Elbourne D, Santos A, Wong IC, O'Neill S, Strange V, Hindmarsh P, Annan F, Viner R.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.

15.

The cost-effectiveness of testing strategies for type 2 diabetes: a modelling study.

Gillett M, Brennan A, Watson P, Khunti K, Davies M, Mostafa S, Gray LJ.

Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(33):1-80. doi: 10.3310/hta19330.

16.

Influence of primary care practices on patients' uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening: a qualitative case study.

Lindenmeyer A, Sturt JA, Hipwell A, Stratton IM, Al-Athamneh N, Gadsby R, O'Hare JP, Scanlon PH.

Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Aug;64(625):e484-92. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680965.

17.

Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.

Eborall HC, Griffin SJ, Prevost AT, Kinmonth AL, French DP, Sutton S.

BMJ. 2007 Sep 8;335(7618):486. Epub 2007 Aug 30.

18.
19.

Screening for type 2 diabetes in a high-risk population: study design and feasibility of a population-based randomized controlled trial.

Klijs B, Otto SJ, Heine RJ, van der Graaf Y, Lous JJ, de Koning HJ.

BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 17;12:671. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-671.

20.

Recruitment into diabetes prevention programs: what is the impact of errors in self-reported measures of obesity?

Hernan A, Philpot B, Janus ED, Dunbar JA.

BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 8;12:510. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-510.

Supplemental Content

Support Center