Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 224

1.

Clinical wear rate of direct and indirect posterior composite resin restorations.

Cetin AR, Unlu N.

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Jun;32(3):e87-94.

PMID:
22408783
2.

Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.

Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 May 1;11(3):025-32.

PMID:
20461321
3.

Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.

Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.

Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1302-14. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 3.

PMID:
19577288
4.

A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth.

Cetin AR, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N.

Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):E1-11. doi: 10.2341/12-160-C. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

PMID:
23215545
5.

Four-year evaluation of a resin composite including nanofillers in posterior cavities.

Schirrmeister JF, Huber K, Hellwig E, Hahn P.

J Adhes Dent. 2009 Oct;11(5):399-404.

PMID:
19841767
6.
7.

Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.

Krämer N, Reinelt C, García-Godoy F, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R.

Am J Dent. 2009 Aug;22(4):228-34.

PMID:
19824560
8.

Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance.

Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.

Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):181-90. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0500-0. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

PMID:
21221678
9.

Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R.

J Adhes Dent. 2010 Jun;12(3):237-43. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17551.

PMID:
20157663
10.

Clinical wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns. One-year results from a randomized clinical trial.

Ohlmann B, Uekermann J, Dreyhaupt J, Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P.

J Dent. 2007 Mar;35(3):246-52. Epub 2006 Oct 5.

PMID:
17027139
11.

A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.

Rocha Gomes Torres C, Rêgo HM, Perote LC, Santos LF, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Di Nicoló R, Borges AB.

J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):793-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

PMID:
24769385
12.

Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.

Walter R, Boushell LW, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr, Chung Y, Swift EJ Jr.

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 May-Jun;26(3):179-90. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12077. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

PMID:
24344912
13.

Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.

Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Shahamat N.

J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Jul;37(7):532-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02073.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

PMID:
20202097
14.

Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years.

Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Feilzer AJ, Frankenberger R.

Dent Mater. 2011 May;27(5):455-64. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.004.

PMID:
21397316
15.

A 12-month clinical evaluation of composite resins in class III restorations.

Loguercio AD, Lorini E, Weiss RV, Tori AP, Picinatto CC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A.

J Adhes Dent. 2007 Feb;9(1):57-64.

PMID:
17432402
16.

Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.

Baracco B, Perdigão J, Cabrera E, Giráldez I, Ceballos L.

Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr;37(2):117-29. doi: 10.2341/11-179-C. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

PMID:
22313275
17.

Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.

Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G.

Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0619-7. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

PMID:
21947906
18.

Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.

Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z.

Oper Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):11-9. doi: 10.2341/09-027CR.

PMID:
20166406
19.

In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.

Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.

Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):213-21. doi: 10.2341/10-215-L. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

PMID:
21702678
20.

Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.

Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MR.

Am J Dent. 2001 Oct;14(5):304-8.

PMID:
11803995

Supplemental Content

Support Center