Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 221

1.

Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):435.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.035. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

PMID:
22397900
2.

Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.

Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC.

Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):532-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.025.

PMID:
22386392
3.

Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.

Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):322-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.008. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

PMID:
21458389
4.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for management of pelvic organ prolapse enhances quality of life at one year: a prospective observational study.

Perez T, Crochet P, Descargues G, Tribondeau P, Soffray F, Gadonneix P, Loundou A, Baumstarck-Barrau K.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.002.

PMID:
22024261
5.

Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.

Barboglio PG, Toler AJ, Triaca V.

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000047.

PMID:
24368487
6.

Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Unger CA, Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Ridgeway B.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):547.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.054. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

PMID:
25088866
7.

Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, Fine P, Menefee S, Ridgeway B, Visco A, Warren LK, Zhang M, Meikle S.

JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2016-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919. Erratum in: JAMA. 2013 Sep 11;310(10):1076.

8.

Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1201-6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce394.

PMID:
19037026
9.

One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.

Jambusaria LH, Murphy M, Lucente VR.

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Mar-Apr;21(2):87-92. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000120.

PMID:
25185594
10.

[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].

Hu CD, Chen YS, Yi XF, Ding JX, Feng WW, Yao LQ, Huang J, Zhang Y, Hu WG, Zhu ZL, Hua KQ.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100. Chinese.

PMID:
21426765
11.

Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.

De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1010-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

PMID:
24780383
12.

Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.

Nosti PA, Umoh Andy U, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L, Gutman RE.

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000036.

PMID:
24368486
13.

[Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].

Han JS, Zhang K, Zhu FL, Yao Y, Liang HM, Zhou LF, Guo HY.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):101-4. Chinese.

PMID:
21426766
14.

Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study.

Sanses TV, Shahryarinejad A, Molden S, Hoskey KA, Abbasy S, Patterson D, Saks EK, Weber Lebrun EE, Gamble TL, King VG, Nguyen AL, Abed H, Young SB; Fellows' Pelvic Research Network..

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):519.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

PMID:
19716533
15.

A prospective study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse.

North CE, Ali-Ross NS, Smith AR, Reid FM.

BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1251-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02116.x. Epub 2009 May 28.

16.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with bone anchor fixation: short-term anatomic and functional results.

Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Mannaerts GH, van der Weiden RM.

Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):481-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1599-5. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

17.

Effects of pelvic organ prolapse repair on urinary symptoms: a comparative study between the laparoscopic and vaginal approach.

Ramanah R, Ballester M, Chereau E, Rouzier R, Daraï E.

Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Jan;31(1):126-31. doi: 10.1002/nau.21117. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

PMID:
21953628
18.

Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy.

Collins SA, Tulikangas PK, O'Sullivan DM.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):438.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.036. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

PMID:
22397901
19.

Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.

Rosenblum N.

Curr Opin Urol. 2012 Jul;22(4):292-6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328354809c. Review.

PMID:
22647648
20.

A novel technique for the management of advanced uterine/vault prolapse: extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy.

Onol FF, Kaya E, Köse O, Onol SY.

Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jul;22(7):855-61. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1378-3. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

PMID:
21340643

Supplemental Content

Support Center