Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 77

1.

A five-point checklist to help performance reports incentivize improvement and effectively guide patients.

Friedberg MW, Damberg CL.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):612-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1202.

2.

Advancing public reporting through a new 'aggregator' to standardize data collection on providers' cost and quality.

Luft HS.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):619-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1162.

3.

Evaluation criteria for report cards of healthcare providers.

Schold JD.

Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2008;19:173-89. Review.

PMID:
19548518
4.

Making performance reports work.

Brown AD, Bhimani H, MacLeod H.

Healthc Pap. 2005;6(2):8-22. Review.

PMID:
16340313
5.
6.

Evaluation of a collaborative program on smoking cessation: translating outcomes framework into practice.

Shershneva MB, Larrison C, Robertson S, Speight M.

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011 Fall;31 Suppl 1:S28-36. doi: 10.1002/chp.20146.

PMID:
22190098
7.

Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.

Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):111-23. Review.

PMID:
18195336
8.

Internet report cards on quality: what exists and the evidence on impact.

Carlisle RT.

W V Med J. 2007 Jul-Oct;103(4):17-21.

PMID:
18159839
9.

Making measures count.

Friedman AN, Fadem SZ.

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jun;6(6):1507-11. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11461210. Epub 2011 May 19.

10.

[The evaluation of health care outcomes and hospital performance indicators].

Chouaid C, Hejblum G, Guidet B, Valleron AJ.

Rev Mal Respir. 2006 Sep;23(4 Suppl):13S87-98; quiz 13S158, 13S159. Review. French.

PMID:
17057634
11.

Evaluation of feedback interventions for improving the quality assurance of cancer screening in Japan: study design and report of the baseline survey.

Machii R, Saika K, Higashi T, Aoki A, Hamashima C, Saito H.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb;42(2):96-104. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr185. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

PMID:
22194630
12.

Point-of-care electronic prompts: an effective means of increasing compliance, demonstrating quality, and improving outcome.

Schwann NM, Bretz KA, Eid S, Burger T, Fry D, Ackler F, Evans P, Romancheck D, Beck M, Ardire AJ, Lukens H, McLoughlin TM.

Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):869-76. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318227b511. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

PMID:
21788319
13.

Data quality bias: an underrecognized source of misclassification in pay-for-performance reporting?

Terris DD, Litaker DG.

Qual Manag Health Care. 2008 Jan-Mar;17(1):19-26. doi: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000308634.59108.60.

PMID:
18204374
14.

Development and pilot of clinical performance indicators for English ambulance services.

Siriwardena AN, Shaw D, Donohoe R, Black S, Stephenson J; National Ambulance Clinical Audit Steering Group.

Emerg Med J. 2010 Apr;27(4):327-31. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.072397.

PMID:
20385697
15.

[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].

Giraldes Mdo R.

Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16. Portuguese.

16.

Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: Part 2--implementation.

Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Jacobs JP, Prager RL, Normand SL, Shewan CM, O'Brien SM, Peterson ED, Grover FL.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Sep;92(3 Suppl):S12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.101. Review.

PMID:
21867788
17.
18.

An ethical framework for cardiac report cards: a qualitative study.

Richard SA, Rawal S, Martin DK.

BMC Med Ethics. 2005 Mar 28;6:E3.

19.

A classification scheme for outcome indicators.

Jennings BM, Staggers N, Brosch LR.

Image J Nurs Sch. 1999;31(4):381-8. Review.

PMID:
10628106
20.

Public reporting of provider performance: can its impact be made greater?

Robinowitz DL, Dudley RA.

Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:517-36. Review.

PMID:
16533128

Supplemental Content

Support Center