Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 128

1.

In vivo comparison of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasonography.

Ramesh S, Papayannis A, Abdel-karim AR, Banerjee S, Brilakis E.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Mar;24(3):111-5.

2.

OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.

Kubo T, Akasaka T, Shite J, Suzuki T, Uemura S, Yu B, Kozuma K, Kitabata H, Shinke T, Habara M, Saito Y, Hou J, Suzuki N, Zhang S.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;6(10):1095-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

3.

Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Lortkipanidze N, Fujino Y, Wang W, Nakamura S, Erglis A, Guagliumi G, Costa MA.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.017.

4.

In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.

Kim SJ, Lee H, Kato K, Yonetsu T, Jang IK.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun;29(5):967-75. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0179-1. Epub 2013 Jan 6.

PMID:
23292151
5.

Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.

Jamil Z, Tearney G, Bruining N, Sihan K, van Soest G, Ligthart J, van Domburg R, Bouma B, Regar E.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jan;29(1):39-51. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0067-8. Epub 2012 May 26.

6.

Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

Fujino Y, Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Wang W, Yamamoto H, Chamié D, Kanaya T, Mehanna E, Tahara S, Nakamura S, Costa MA.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):E173-83. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24843. Epub 2013 Mar 16.

PMID:
23359350
7.

Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.

Habara M, Nasu K, Terashima M, Kaneda H, Yokota D, Ko E, Ito T, Kurita T, Tanaka N, Kimura M, Ito T, Kinoshita Y, Tsuchikane E, Asakura K, Asakura Y, Katoh O, Suzuki T.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(2):193-201. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965111. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

8.

In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.

Tu S, Xu L, Ligthart J, Xu B, Witberg K, Sun Z, Koning G, Reiber JH, Regar E.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug;28(6):1315-27. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0016-6. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

9.

Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.

D'Ascenzo F, Barbero U, Cerrato E, Lipinski MJ, Omedè P, Montefusco A, Taha S, Naganuma T, Reith S, Voros S, Latib A, Gonzalo N, Quadri G, Colombo A, Biondi-Zoccai G, Escaned J, Moretti C, Gaita F.

Am Heart J. 2015 May;169(5):663-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

PMID:
25965714
10.

Comparison of longitudinal geometric measurement in human coronary arteries between frequency-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.

Liu Y, Shimamura K, Kubo T, Tanaka A, Kitabata H, Ino Y, Tanimoto T, Shiono Y, Orii M, Yamano T, Yamaguchi T, Hirata K, Imanishi T, Akasaka T.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Feb;30(2):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0330-7. Epub 2013 Nov 24.

PMID:
24272334
11.

Optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical criteria for functionally significant coronary stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve.

Shiono Y, Kitabata H, Kubo T, Masuno T, Ohta S, Ozaki Y, Sougawa H, Orii M, Shimamura K, Ishibashi K, Komukai K, Yamano T, Tanimoto T, Ino Y, Yamaguchi T, Hirata K, Mizukoshi M, Imanishi T, Akasaka T.

Circ J. 2012;76(9):2218-25. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

12.

Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.

Kobayashi Y, Kitahara H, Tanaka S, Okada K, Kimura T, Ikeno F, Yock PG, Fitzgerald PJ, Honda Y.

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2016 Apr;31(2):79-88. doi: 10.1007/s12928-015-0349-x. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

13.

Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters.

Zafar H, Ullah I, Dinneen K, Matiullah S, Hanley A, Leahy MJ, Sharif F.

J Cardiol. 2014 Jul;64(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 22.

14.

Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.

Kochman J, Pietrasik A, Rdzanak A, Jąkała J, Zasada W, Scibisz A, Kołtowski L, Proniewska K, Pociask E, Legutko J.

Kardiol Pol. 2014;72(6):534-40. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2013.0317. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

15.

Safety and feasibility of an intravascular optical coherence tomography image wire system in the clinical setting.

Yamaguchi T, Terashima M, Akasaka T, Hayashi T, Mizuno K, Muramatsu T, Nakamura M, Nakamura S, Saito S, Takano M, Takayama T, Yoshikawa J, Suzuki T.

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Mar 1;101(5):562-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.09.116. Epub 2008 Jan 10.

PMID:
18307999
16.

Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans.

Papafaklis MI, Bourantas CV, Yonetsu T, Vergallo R, Kotsia A, Nakatani S, Lakkas LS, Athanasiou LS, Naka KK, Fotiadis DI, Feldman CL, Stone PH, Serruys PW, Jang IK, Michalis LK.

EuroIntervention. 2015 Aug;11(4):407-15. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M06_11.

17.

Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography: a comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound.

Gonzalo N, Escaned J, Alfonso F, Nolte C, Rodriguez V, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Bañuelos C, Fernández-Ortiz A, Garcia E, Hernandez-Antolin R, Macaya C.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1080-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.078. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 17;59(16):1491. Gonzalo, Nieve [corrected to Gonzalo, Nieves]; Fernández-Ortiz, Antonia [corrected to Fernández-Ortiz, Antonio].

18.

Comparison of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for the assessment of in-stent tissue coverage after stent implantation.

Capodanno D, Prati F, Pawlowsky T, Cera M, La Manna A, Albertucci M, Tamburino C.

EuroIntervention. 2009 Nov;5(5):538-43.

PMID:
20142173
19.

Reproducibility of coronary optical coherence tomography for lumen and length measurements in humans (The CLI-VAR [Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-VARiability] study).

Fedele S, Biondi-Zoccai G, Kwiatkowski P, Di Vito L, Occhipinti M, Cremonesi A, Albertucci M, Materia L, Paoletti G, Prati F.

Am J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 15;110(8):1106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.047. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

PMID:
22748353
20.

The ability of optical coherence tomography to monitor percutaneous coronary intervention: detailed comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

Kawamori H, Shite J, Shinke T, Otake H, Sawada T, Kato H, Miyoshi N, Yoshino N, Kozuki A, Hariki H, Inoue T, Hirata K.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Nov;22(11):541-5.

Supplemental Content

Support Center