Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA. Complication rate and control of risk factors.

Grzyska U, Freitag J, Zeumer H.

Neuroradiology. 1990;32(4):296-9.

PMID:
2234388
2.
3.
4.

Headache After Cerebral Angiography: Frequency, Predisposing Factors, and Predictors of Recovery.

Kwon MA, Hong CK, Joo JY, Kim YB, Chung J.

J Neuroimaging. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):89-94. doi: 10.1111/jon.12290. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

PMID:
26331267
5.

Arteriographic complications in the DSA era.

Waugh JR, Sacharias N.

Radiology. 1992 Jan;182(1):243-6.

PMID:
1727290
6.

[Digital subtraction angiography of the cerebral vessels by intraarterial injection].

Nagata I, Kikuchi H, Karasawa J, Mitsugi T, Naruo Y, Takamiya M.

No Shinkei Geka. 1984 Oct;12(11):1273-8. Japanese.

PMID:
6392918
8.

Cerebral veins: comparative study of CT venography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

Wetzel SG, Kirsch E, Stock KW, Kolbe M, Kaim A, Radue EW.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Feb;20(2):249-55.

9.

Complication rates of DSA and conventional film cerebral angiography.

Pelz DM.

Radiology. 1992 Dec;185(3):908. No abstract available.

PMID:
1438785
10.

On the complication rate of cerebral angiography.

Reisner H, Samec P, Zeiler K.

Neurosurg Rev. 1980;3(1):23-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
7453960
11.

Application of low injection rate and low contrast agent dose in three-dimensional rotational digital subtraction angiography of the intracranial aneurysm.

Gao Z, Zeng Y, Sun J, Yang J, Zhou Y, Zhou M, Song T.

Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Jun;22(3):287-92. doi: 10.1177/1591019916631980. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

12.

[Preliminary evaluation of diagnostic usefulness of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the diagnosis of brain diseases].

Selmaj K, Szulc-Kuberska J, Judycki A, Zajgner J, Prusiński A.

Neurol Neurochir Pol. 1989 Mar-Apr;23(2):111-7. Polish.

PMID:
2615883
13.
14.

Digital subtraction angiography in cerebrovascular diseases. Correlation of DSA with clinical findings.

Bohutová J, Marková H, Kuncová S.

Cas Lek Cesk. 1990 Jul 27;129(30):940-4. Czech.

PMID:
2208223
15.

Safety of cerebral digital subtraction angiography in children: complication rate analysis in 241 consecutive diagnostic angiograms.

Burger IM, Murphy KJ, Jordan LC, Tamargo RJ, Gailloud P.

Stroke. 2006 Oct;37(10):2535-9. Epub 2006 Aug 31.

16.

Practical techniques for reducing radiation exposure during cerebral angiography procedures.

Pearl MS, Torok C, Wang J, Wyse E, Mahesh M, Gailloud P.

J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Feb;7(2):141-5. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010982. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

PMID:
24489125
17.

Quantitation of regional cerebral blood flow: the next chapter in digital subtraction angiography.

Mohammad YM.

J Neuroimaging. 2006 Apr;16(2):179-80; author reply 181. No abstract available.

PMID:
16629744
18.

X-ray digital subtraction angiography with 1 mol/L gadobutrol: results from a comparative porcine study With iodinated contrast agents.

Kalinowski M, Kress O, Wels T, Alfke H, Klose KJ, Wagner HJ.

Invest Radiol. 2002 May;37(5):254-62.

PMID:
11979151
19.

Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases.

Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, Ishigame K, Nambu A, Kumagai H, Araki T.

Eur Radiol. 2000;10(12):1858-64.

PMID:
11305560
20.

The use of gadolinium for arterial interventions.

Sambol EB, Van der Meer JG, Graham A, Goldstein LJ, Karwowski JK, Dayal R, Derubertis B, Kent KC.

Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Apr;25(3):366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.09.012. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

PMID:
21288688

Supplemental Content

Support Center