Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 206

1.

Are low and high number magnitudes processed differently while resolving the conflict evoked by the SNARC effect?

Gut M, Szumska I, Wasilewska M, Jaśkowski P.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Jul;85(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

PMID:
22343113
2.

Differential modulation of the N2 and P3 event-related potentials by response conflict and inhibition.

Groom MJ, Cragg L.

Brain Cogn. 2015 Jul;97:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 4.

PMID:
25955278
3.
4.

Conflict control processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: an event related potentials study.

Mahé G, Doignon-Camus N, Dufour A, Bonnefond A.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jan;125(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

PMID:
23810636
5.

Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.

Larson MJ, Kaufman DA, Perlstein WM.

Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.013. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

PMID:
19071142
6.

Response inhibition of children with ADHD in the stop-signal task: an event-related potential study.

Senderecka M, Grabowska A, Szewczyk J, Gerc K, Chmylak R.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Jul;85(1):93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

PMID:
21641941
7.

Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.

Kirmizi-Alsan E, Bayraktaroglu Z, Gurvit H, Keskin YH, Emre M, Demiralp T.

Brain Res. 2006 Aug 9;1104(1):114-28. Epub 2006 Jul 7.

PMID:
16824492
8.
9.

Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.

Aarts E, Roelofs A, van Turennout M.

Neuropsychologia. 2009 Aug;47(10):2089-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 Apr 5.

PMID:
19467359
10.

Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude.

Bull R, Benson PJ.

Horm Behav. 2006 Aug;50(2):194-9. Epub 2006 Apr 3.

PMID:
16595134
11.

The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?

Dimoska A, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ.

Brain Cogn. 2006 Nov;62(2):98-112. Epub 2006 Jun 30.

PMID:
16814442
12.

Event-related potentials in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an investigation using an auditory oddball task.

Senderecka M, Grabowska A, Gerc K, Szewczyk J, Chmylak R.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Jul;85(1):106-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

PMID:
21640766
13.

Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.

Bae GY, Choi JM, Cho YS, Proctor RW.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1506-21. doi: 10.1037/a0017257.

PMID:
19857020
14.

Neural mechanism of conflict control in a number interference task.

Xiao X, Yang W, Jia L, Lei M, Chen A, Zhang Q.

Neuroreport. 2011 Dec 21;22(18):979-83. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834d8853.

PMID:
22045253
15.
16.

Conflict adaptation and cognitive control adjustments following traumatic brain injury.

Larson MJ, Kaufman DA, Perlstein WM.

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Nov;15(6):927-37. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709990701. Epub 2009 Sep 21.

PMID:
19765356
17.

Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage.

Keus IM, Jenks KM, Schwarz W.

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):48-56. Epub 2005 Jan 23.

PMID:
15922157
18.

Response-selection conflict contributes to inhibition of return.

Prime DJ, Jolicoeur P.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 May;21(5):991-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21105.

PMID:
18752398
19.

Stroop interference effect in schizophrenic patients: an electrophysiological approach.

Markela-Lerenc J, Schmidt-Kraepelin C, Roesch-Ely D, Mundt C, Weisbrod M, Kaiser S.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Mar;71(3):248-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

PMID:
19007825
20.

Individual differences in executive functioning modulate age effects on the ERP correlates of retrieval success.

Angel L, Fay S, Bouazzaoui B, Isingrini M.

Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3540-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

PMID:
20709089

Supplemental Content

Support Center