Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 150

1.

Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest risk for adding-on... and why?

Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton PO.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 15;37(16):1384-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824bac7a.

PMID:
22322370
2.

Distal adding-on phenomenon in Lenke 1A scoliosis: risk factor identification and treatment strategy comparison.

Wang Y, Hansen ES, Høy K, Wu C, Bünger CE.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun 15;36(14):1113-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f51e95.

PMID:
21242876
3.

Selective thoracic surgery in the Lenke type 1A: King III and King IV type curves.

Parisini P, Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18 Suppl 1:82-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0990-0. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

4.

Is the lumbar modifier useful in surgical decision making?: defining two distinct Lenke 1A curve patterns.

Miyanji F, Pawelek JB, Van Valin SE, Upasani VV, Newton PO.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov 1;33(23):2545-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891822.

PMID:
18923336
5.

Postoperative distal adding-on and related factors in Lenke type 1A curve.

Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Uno K, Suzuki T, Ito M, Yanagida H, Yamaguchi T, Minami S, Akazawa T.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 20;38(9):737-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318279b666.

PMID:
23104198
6.

Distal fusion level selection in Lenke 1A curves according to axial plane analyses.

Erdemir C, Musaoğlu R, Selek Ö, Gök Ü, Şarlak AY.

Spine J. 2015 Nov 1;15(11):2378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

PMID:
26208878
7.

Postoperative trunk shift in Lenke 1C scoliosis: what causes it? How can it be prevented?

Wang Y, Bünger CE, Wu C, Zhang Y, Hansen ES.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 1;37(19):1676-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318255a053.

PMID:
22460921
8.

Predictors of Distal Adding-on in Thoracic Major Curves With AR Lumbar Modifiers.

Murphy JS, Upasani VV, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Bartley CE, Samdani A, Lenke LG, Newton PO.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb 15;42(4):E211-E218. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001761.

PMID:
28207660
9.

Selection of lower instrumented vertebra in treating Lenke type 2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Cao K, Watanabe K, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Hosogane N, Yonezawa I, Machida M, Yagi M, Kaneko S, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 15;39(4):E253-61. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000126.

PMID:
24253795
10.

Radiographic features of the Lenke 1A curves to help to determine the optimum distal fusion level selection.

Sarlak AY, Atmaca H, Kim WJ, Musaoğlu R, Tosun B.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 1;36(19):1592-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f54f7f.

PMID:
21242874
11.

Postoperative behavior of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve and coronal balance after posterior thoracic fusion for Lenke 1C and 2C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Ishikawa M, Cao K, Pang L, Watanabe K, Yagi M, Hosogane N, Machida M, Shiono Y, Nishiyama M, Fukui Y, Matsumoto M.

J Orthop Sci. 2015 Jan;20(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0655-7. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

PMID:
25308212
12.

Cobb-1 versus cobb-to-cobb anterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C curves: a radiological comparative study.

Dubory A, Miladi L, Ilharreborde B, Gennari JM, Rouissi J, Glorion C, Flouzat Lachaniette CH, Odent T.

Eur Spine J. 2017 Jun;26(6):1711-1720. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4788-6. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

PMID:
27704285
13.

Selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1C curves: prevalence and criteria.

Crawford CH 3rd, Lenke LG, Sucato DJ, Richards BS 3rd, Emans JB, Vitale MG, Erickson MA, Sanders JO.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 15;38(16):1380-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182987360.

PMID:
23632336
14.

Selective versus nonselective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1C curves: a meta-analysis of baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes.

Boniello AJ, Hasan S, Yang S, Jalai CM, Worley N, Passias PG.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):721-30. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE141020. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

PMID:
26315956
15.

Adding thoracic fusion levels in Lenke 5 curves: risks and benefits.

Lark RK, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Newton PO; Harms Study Group.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jan 15;38(2):195-200. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182634c85.

PMID:
22691919
16.

Selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: factors influencing the selection of the optimal lowest instrumented vertebra.

Takahashi J, Newton PO, Ugrinow VL, Bastrom TP.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun 15;36(14):1131-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182053d19.

PMID:
21343851
17.

Comparison of the lowest instrumented, stable, and lower end vertebrae in "single overhang" thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: anterior versus posterior spinal fusion.

Kuklo TR, O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Polly DW, Sucato DS, Richards BS, Lubicky J, Ibrahim K, Kawakami N, King A; Spinal Deformity Study Group: AIS Section.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19):2232-6.

PMID:
16946660
18.

Axial plane analysis of Lenke 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as an aid to identify curve characteristics.

Atmaca H, Inanmaz ME, Bal E, Caliskan I, Kose KC.

Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2425-33. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

PMID:
24534387
19.

Preventing Fusion Mass Shift Avoids Postoperative Distal Curve Adding-on in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Shigematsu H, Cheung JP, Bruzzone M, Matsumori H, Mak KC, Samartzis D, Luk KD.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1448-1460. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5216-2. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

20.

Parameters leading to a successful radiographic outcome following surgical treatment for Lenke 2 curves.

Koller H, Meier O, McClung A, Hitzl W, Mayer M, Sucato D.

Eur Spine J. 2015 Jul;24(7):1490-501. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3772-x. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

PMID:
25645588

Supplemental Content

Support Center