Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

E-mail invitations to general practitioners were as effective as postal invitations and were more efficient.

Treweek S, Barnett K, Maclennan G, Bonetti D, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Jones C, Pitts NB, Ricketts IW, Weal M, Sullivan F.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;65(7):793-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.010.

PMID:
22306007
3.

Electronic reminders did not improve postal questionnaire response rates or response times: a randomized controlled trial.

Man MS, Tilbrook HE, Jayakody S, Hewitt CE, Cox H, Cross B, Torgerson DJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):1001-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.013.

PMID:
21292441
4.

Randomized controlled trial comparing telephone and mail follow-up for recruitment of participants into a clinical trial of colorectal cancer screening.

Wong AD, Kirby J, Guyatt GH, Moayyedi P, Vora P, You JJ.

Trials. 2013 Feb 11;14:40. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-40.

5.

Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.

Glidewell L, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Bonetti D, Johnston M, Eccles MP, Edlin R, Pitts NB, Clarkson J, Steen N, Grimshaw JM.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 14;12:250. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-250.

6.

A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.

Zuidgeest M, Hendriks M, Koopman L, Spreeuwenberg P, Rademakers J.

J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 27;13(3):e68. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1241.

7.

The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic review.

Pit SW, Vo T, Pyakurel S.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 6;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-76. Review.

8.

Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.

Hocking JS, Lim MS, Read T, Hellard M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):521-4.

PMID:
16632141
9.

Effect of e-mail versus postal reminders for mammogram screening.

Chaudhry R, Cabanela R, Rahman A, McMurtry E, Leutink D, Scheitel S, Naessens JM.

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:879.

10.

No difference demonstrated between faxed or mailed prenotification in promoting questionnaire response among family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.

Gattellari M, Zwar N, Worthington JM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 May;65(5):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.014.

PMID:
22445084
11.

Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone.

Couper MP, Peytchev A, Strecher VJ, Rothert K, Anderson J.

J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jun 13;9(2):e16.

13.

A comparative analysis of recruitment methods used in a randomized trial of diabetes education interventions.

Beaton SJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Worley AV, Fernandes OD, Baumer D, Hanson AM, Parker ED, Busch ME, Davis HT, Spain CV.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov;31(6):549-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.08.005.

PMID:
20713181
14.

Recruiting and retaining GPs and patients in intervention studies: the DEPS-GP project as a case study.

Williamson MK, Pirkis J, Pfaff JJ, Tyson O, Sim M, Kerse N, Lautenschlager NT, Stocks NP, Almeida OP.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Sep 18;7:42.

15.

Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.

McMahon SR, Iwamoto M, Massoudi MS, Yusuf HR, Stevenson JM, David F, Chu SY, Pickering LK.

Pediatrics. 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):e299-303.

PMID:
12671142
16.

You've got mail … and need follow-up: the effect and patient perception of e-mail follow-up reminders after emergency department discharge.

Sharp B, Singal B, Pulia M, Fowler J, Simmons S.

Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/acem.12564.

17.

Participation in breast cancer screening: randomised controlled trials of doctors' letters and of telephone reminders.

Richardson A, Williams S, Elwood M, Bahr M, Medlicott T.

Aust J Public Health. 1994 Sep;18(3):290-2.

PMID:
7841259
18.

Comparison of reminder methods in selected adolescents with records in an immunization registry.

Morris J, Wang W, Wang L, Peddecord KM, Sawyer MH.

J Adolesc Health. 2015 May;56(5 Suppl):S27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.010.

PMID:
25863551
19.

Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.

Akl EA, Maroun N, Klocke RA, Montori V, Schünemann HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):425-9.

PMID:
15862729
20.

Registered post achieved a higher response rate than normal mail--a randomized controlled trial.

Pedrana A, Hellard M, Giles M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;61(9):896-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.01.004.

PMID:
18619793

Supplemental Content

Support Center