Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 390

1.

Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool?

Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Huynh VB, Etafy M, McDougall EM.

J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):998-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.160. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

PMID:
22264455
2.

Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery.

Kenney PA, Wszolek MF, Gould JJ, Libertino JA, Moinzadeh A.

Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.044. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

PMID:
19362352
3.

Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.

Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, Cai J, Ng CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM.

J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.064. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

PMID:
21784469
4.

Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.

Ramos P, Montez J, Tripp A, Ng CK, Gill IS, Hung AJ.

BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5):836-42. doi: 10.1111/bju.12559. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

5.

The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer(®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills.

Perrenot C, Perez M, Tran N, Jehl JP, Felblinger J, Bresler L, Hubert J.

Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2587-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2237-0. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

PMID:
22476836
6.

Comparison of two simulation systems to support robotic-assisted surgical training: a pilot study (Swine model).

Whitehurst SV, Lockrow EG, Lendvay TS, Propst AM, Dunlow SG, Rosemeyer CJ, Gobern JM, White LW, Skinner A, Buller JL.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):483-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.160. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

PMID:
25543068
7.

Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device.

Foell K, Furse A, Honey RJ, Pace KT, Lee JY.

J Robot Surg. 2013 Dec;7(4):365-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0403-6. Epub 2013 Apr 21.

PMID:
27001876
8.

VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator.

Lendvay TS, Casale P, Sweet R, Peters C.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;132:242-4.

PMID:
18391295
9.

Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator.

Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding GE, Guru KA.

Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):357-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.069. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

PMID:
20299081
10.

Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education.

Liss MA, Abdelshehid C, Quach S, Lusch A, Graversen J, Landman J, McDougall EM.

J Endourol. 2012 Dec;26(12):1629-34. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0328. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
22845173
11.

The SEP "robot": a valid virtual reality robotic simulator for the Da Vinci Surgical System?

van der Meijden OA, Broeders IA, Schijven MP.

Surg Technol Int. 2010 Apr;19:51-8.

PMID:
20437345
12.

Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.

Hung AJ, Jayaratna IS, Teruya K, Desai MM, Gill IS, Goh AC.

BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):864-71. doi: 10.1111/bju.12045. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

13.

Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.

Lin DW, Romanelli JR, Kuhn JN, Thompson RE, Bush RW, Seymour NE.

Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):209-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9805-3. Epub 2008 Feb 23.

PMID:
18297349
14.

Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum.

Connolly M, Seligman J, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC.

Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1691-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3373-x. Epub 2014 Jan 1.

PMID:
24380993
15.

Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy.

Hung AJ, Shah SH, Dalag L, Shin D, Gill IS.

J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2949. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

PMID:
25801765
16.

Face, content and concurrent validity of the Mimic® dV-Trainer for robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a prospective study.

Egi H, Hattori M, Tokunaga M, Suzuki T, Kawaguchi K, Sawada H, Ohdan H.

Eur Surg Res. 2013;50(3-4):292-300. doi: 10.1159/000353435. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

PMID:
23859887
17.

Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator.

Kelly DC, Margules AC, Kundavaram CR, Narins H, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD.

Urology. 2012 May;79(5):1068-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.028.

PMID:
22546387
18.

The Tube 3 module designed for practicing vesicourethral anastomosis in a virtual reality robotic simulator: determination of face, content, and construct validity.

Kang SG, Cho S, Kang SH, Haidar AM, Samavedi S, Palmer KJ, Patel VR, Cheon J.

Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

PMID:
24975707
19.

Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.

Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, Monteny LJ, Dankelman J.

Surg Endosc. 2006 Mar;20(3):511-8. Epub 2006 Jan 25.

PMID:
16437275
20.

Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker.

Tausch TJ, Kowalewski TM, White LW, McDonough PS, Brand TC, Lendvay TS.

J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):919-23. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

PMID:
22819403

Supplemental Content

Support Center