Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 125

1.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus da Vinci robotic hysterectomy: is using the robot beneficial?

Soto E, Lo Y, Friedman K, Soto C, Nezhat F, Chuang L, Gretz H.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;22(4):253-9. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2011.22.4.253. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

2.

An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.

Eddib A, Jain N, Aalto M, Hughes S, Eswar A, Erk M, Michalik C, Krovi V, Singhal P.

J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0388-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

PMID:
27000926
3.

Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.

Povolotskaya N, Woolas R, Brinkmann D.

Int J Surg Oncol. 2015;2015:814315. doi: 10.1155/2015/814315. Epub 2015 Feb 15.

4.

Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Winter ML, Leu SY, Lagrew DC Jr, Bustillo G.

J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;9(4):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0526-z. Epub 2015 Jul 30.

PMID:
26530837
5.

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.

Payne TN, Dauterive FR.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

PMID:
18439499
6.

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

PMID:
20207063
7.

Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications.

Jacome EG, Hebert AE, Christian F.

J Robot Surg. 2013 Mar;7(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0339-2. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

PMID:
27000891
8.

Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.

Catanzarite T, Saha S, Pilecki MA, Kim JY, Milad MP.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1049-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

PMID:
26070725
9.

A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.

Lopez S, Mulla ZD, Hernandez L, Garza DM, Payne TN, Farnam RW.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):84-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.883. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

PMID:
26321172
10.
11.

Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.

Lim PC, Crane JT, English EJ, Farnam RW, Garza DM, Winter ML, Rozeboom JL.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jun;133(3):359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.010. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

12.

[Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].

Marek R, Dzvinčuk P, Kudela M, Hambálek P, Maděrka M, Zapletalová J, Pilka R.

Ceska Gynekol. 2015 Oct;80(5):324-32. Czech.

PMID:
26606116
13.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.

Martínez-Maestre MA, Gambadauro P, González-Cejudo C, Torrejón R.

Surg Innov. 2014 Jun;21(3):250-5. doi: 10.1177/1553350613492023. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

PMID:
23833240
14.

Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.

Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S.

Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Dec;111(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

PMID:
18829091
15.

Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women.

Rebeles SA, Muntz HG, Wieneke-Broghammer C, Vason ES, McGonigle KF.

J Robot Surg. 2009 Oct;3(3):141. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0149-3. Epub 2009 Aug 26.

PMID:
27638370
16.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system.

Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA.

JSLS. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):13-5.

17.

The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy.

Vree FE, Cohen SL, Chavan N, Einarsson JI.

JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):174-81. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13753907291594.

18.

[A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].

Aniuliene R, Varzgaliene L, Varzgalis M.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43(2):118-24. Lithuanian.

19.

A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Falcone T, Einarsson JI.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;208(5):368.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23395927
20.

Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.

Desille-Gbaguidi H, Hebert T, Paternotte-Villemagne J, Gaborit C, Rush E, Body G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Dec;171(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.025. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

PMID:
24135382

Supplemental Content

Support Center