Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

A biomechanical comparison of a locking plate, a nail, and a 95° angled blade plate for fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Forward DP, Doro CJ, OʼToole RV, Kim H, Floyd JC, Sciadini MF, Turen CH, Hsieh AH, Nascone JW.

J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jun;26(6):334-40. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182254ea3. Erratum in: J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Aug;26(8):498. Turen, Clifford H [added]; Hsieh, Adam H [added]; Nascone, Jason W [added].

PMID:
22241399
2.

Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Floyd JC, O'Toole RV, Stall A, Forward DP, Nabili M, Shillingburg D, Hsieh A, Nascone JW.

J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Oct;23(9):628-33. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181b04835.

PMID:
19897983
3.

A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.

Crist BD, Khalafi A, Hazelwood SJ, Lee MA.

J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Oct;23(9):622-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a2a31d.

PMID:
19897982
4.

Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.

Higgins TF, Pittman G, Hines J, Bachus KN.

J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Jan;21(1):43-6.

PMID:
17211268
5.

Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone: surgical technique.

Mückley T, Wähnert D, Hoffmeier KL, von Oldenburg G, Fröber R, Hofmann GO.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar;93 Suppl 1:40-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01142.

PMID:
21411685
6.

Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone.

Wähnert D, Hoffmeier KL, von Oldenburg G, Fröber R, Hofmann GO, Mückley T.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun;92(6):1442-52. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01722.

PMID:
20516320
7.

Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.

Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER, Norton J, Connor PM, Kellam JF.

J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Sep;20(8):547-54.

PMID:
16990726
9.

Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. A biomechanical study.

Kummer FJ, Olsson O, Pearlman CA, Ceder L, Larsson S, Koval KJ.

Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Dec;69(6):580-4.

PMID:
9930101
10.

Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.

Heiney JP, Barnett MD, Vrabec GA, Schoenfeld AJ, Baji A, Njus GO.

J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):443-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815edeb8.

PMID:
19204519
11.

Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques.

Aminian A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, Zhang LQ, Kalainov DM, Merk BR.

J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Sep;21(8):544-8.

PMID:
17805021
12.

A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Tencer AF, Johnson KD, Johnston DW, Gill K.

J Orthop Res. 1984;2(3):297-305.

PMID:
6491820
13.

Biomechanical comparison of double-row locking plates versus single- and double-row non-locking plates in a comminuted metacarpal fracture model.

Gajendran VK, Szabo RM, Myo GK, Curtiss SB.

J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Dec;34(10):1851-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Nov 7.

PMID:
19897325
14.

Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness.

Foruria AM, Carrascal MT, Revilla C, Munuera L, Sanchez-Sotelo J.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 May;25(4):307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

PMID:
20153916
15.

Immediate weight bearing of comminuted supracondylar femur fractures using locked plate fixation.

Granata JD, Litsky AS, Lustenberger DP, Probe RA, Ellis TJ.

Orthopedics. 2012 Aug 1;35(8):e1210-3. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120725-21.

PMID:
22868607
16.

Distal femoral fractures in the elderly: biomechanical analysis of a polyaxial angle-stable locking plate versus a retrograde intramedullary nail in a human cadaveric bone model.

Bliemel C, Buecking B, Mueller T, Wack C, Koutras C, Beck T, Ruchholtz S, Zettl R.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2111-8. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

PMID:
25388863
17.

Locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with impaction of the fracture site to restore medial column support: a biomechanical study.

Weeks CA, Begum F, Beaupre LA, Carey JP, Adeeb S, Bouliane MJ.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Nov;22(11):1552-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

PMID:
23639833
18.

Mechanical characteristics of locking and compression plate constructs applied dorsally to distal radius fractures.

Boswell S, McIff TE, Trease CA, Toby EB.

J Hand Surg Am. 2007 May-Jun;32(5):623-9.

PMID:
17481999
19.

A biomechanical analysis of locking plate fixation with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in a subtrochanteric fracture model.

Kim JW, Oh CW, Byun YS, Oh JK, Kim HJ, Min WK, Park SK, Park BC.

J Trauma. 2011 Jan;70(1):E19-23. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d40418.

PMID:
20495493
20.

[Biomechanical research of less invasive stabilization system and dynamic condylar screw in fixing subtrochanteric fractures of femur].

Yang Y, Ma X, Ma J, Zhu S, Ma B, Ji S, Ma T, Chen Y.

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;26(10):1213-7. Chinese.

PMID:
23167106

Supplemental Content

Support Center