Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

World wide web-based cytological analysis of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesions.

Washiya K, Takamizu R, Kumagai Y, Himeji Y, Kobayashi T, Iwai M, Watanabe J.

Acta Cytol. 2012;56(1):47-54. doi: 10.1159/000331053. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

PMID:
22236745
2.

Cytological analysis of atypical squamous epithelial cells of undetermined significance using the world wide web.

Washiya K, Abe I, Ambo J, Iwai M, Okusawa E, Asanuma K, Watanabe J.

Acta Cytol. 2011;55(4):319-26. doi: 10.1159/000326933. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

PMID:
21791900
3.

Outcome of "Atypical squamous cells" in a cervical cytology screening program: implications for follow up in resource limited settings.

Gupta S, Sodhani P, Chachra KL, Singh V, Sehgal A.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2007 Nov;35(11):677-80.

PMID:
17924415
5.
6.

[The usefulness of p16INK4a in cytological screening of cervical carcinoma].

Li M, Cao J, Wang NP, Li LY, Li L, Qiao YL, Pan QJ.

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2006 Sep;28(9):674-7. Chinese.

PMID:
17274373
8.

Interobserver concordance in the assessment of features used for the diagnosis of cervical atypical squamous cells and squamous intraepithelial lesions (ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL and HSIL).

Bigras G, Wilson J, Russell L, Johnson G, Morel D, Saddik M.

Cytopathology. 2013 Feb;24(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00930.x. Epub 2011 Oct 19.

PMID:
22007754
9.

[Evaluation of clinical management strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in cervical cytology].

Bian ML, Chen QY, Zhang XY, Ou H, Liu J.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Sep 5;86(33):2339-42. Chinese.

PMID:
17156632
10.

The value of duplicate slides on atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade intraepithelial lesion.

Zhang S, Kelly B, Hospodar E, Thibodeaux J, Thomas J, Abreo F.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Jan;40(1):14-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.21481. Epub 2010 Nov 9.

PMID:
22180233
11.
12.

Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL: a review of original vs. duplicate thin-layer slides.

Quddus MR, Sung CJ, Eklund MJ, Zhang C, Steinhoff MM.

J Reprod Med. 2004 Jun;49(6):457-62.

PMID:
15283054
13.

Is atypical squamous cells that cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion clinically significant?

McHale MT, Souther J, Elkas JC, Monk BJ, Harrison TA.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Apr;11(2):86-9.

PMID:
17415112
14.

Cytopathology update on atypical squamous cells.

Davey DD.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005 Apr;9(2):124-9.

PMID:
15870535
15.

Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: cytohistologic correlation study with diagnostic pitfalls.

Mokhtar GA, Delatour NL, Assiri AH, Gilliatt MA, Senterman M, Islam S.

Acta Cytol. 2008 Mar-Apr;52(2):169-77.

PMID:
18499989
16.

Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: diagnostic features in surepath™ cervical samples.

Gupta N, Crossley J, Dudding N, Ellis K, Smith JH.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2013 Jun;41(6):520-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.22885. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

PMID:
22807399
17.
18.

Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.

Kumar N, Bongiovanni M, Molliet MJ, Pelte MF, Egger JF, Pache JC.

Cytopathology. 2009 Dec;20(6):351-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00568.x. Epub 2008 Jun 3.

PMID:
18522633
20.

Clinical significance of cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high grade, in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Saad RS, Dabbs DJ, Kordunsky L, Kanbour-Shakir A, Silverman JF, Liu Y, Kanbour A.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Sep;126(3):381-8.

PMID:
16880134

Supplemental Content

Support Center