Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 159

1.

The efficiency of asset management strategies to reduce urban flood risk.

ten Veldhuis JA, Clemens FH.

Water Sci Technol. 2011;64(6):1317-24.

PMID:
22214086
2.

Fault tree analysis for urban flooding.

ten Veldhuis JA, Clemens FH, van Gelder PH.

Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(8):1621-9. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.171.

PMID:
19403976
3.

Microbial risks associated with exposure to pathogens in contaminated urban flood water.

ten Veldhuis JA, Clemens FH, Sterk G, Berends BR.

Water Res. 2010 May;44(9):2910-8. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

PMID:
20227742
4.

Urban flood risk assessment using sewer flooding databases.

Caradot N, Granger D, Chapgier J, Cherqui F, Chocat B.

Water Sci Technol. 2011;64(4):832-40.

PMID:
22097068
5.

Flood risk modelling based on tangible and intangible urban flood damage quantification.

ten Veldhuis JA, Clemens FH.

Water Sci Technol. 2010;62(1):189-95. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.243.

PMID:
20595770
6.

Decision making in flood risk based storm sewer network design.

Sun SA, Djordjević S, Khu ST.

Water Sci Technol. 2011;64(1):247-54.

PMID:
22053482
7.
8.

Flood risk assessment in The Netherlands: a case study for dike ring South Holland.

Jonkman SN, Kok M, Vrijling JK.

Risk Anal. 2008 Oct;28(5):1357-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01103.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.

PMID:
18761731
9.

Green-blue water in the city: quantification of impact of source control versus end-of-pipe solutions on sewer and river floods.

De Vleeschauwer K, Weustenraad J, Nolf C, Wolfs V, De Meulder B, Shannon K, Willems P.

Water Sci Technol. 2014;70(11):1825-37. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.306.

PMID:
25500472
10.

Uncertainty in urban flood damage assessment due to urban drainage modelling and depth-damage curve estimation.

Freni G, La Loggia G, Notaro V.

Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(12):2979-93. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.177.

PMID:
20555194
11.

Assessment of vulnerability to extreme flash floods in design storms.

Kim ES, Choi HI.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jul;8(7):2907-22. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8072907. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

12.

The management of urban surface water flood risks: SUDS performance in flood reduction from extreme events.

Viavattene C, Ellis JB.

Water Sci Technol. 2013;67(1):99-108. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.537.

PMID:
23128626
13.
14.

Flood risk assessment in European river basins--concept, methods, and challenges exemplified at the Mulde River.

Meyer V, Haase D, Scheuer S.

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Jan;5(1):17-26.

PMID:
19431288
15.

Impact of sewer condition on urban flooding: an uncertainty analysis based on field observations and Monte Carlo simulations on full hydrodynamic models.

van Bijnen M, Korving H, Clemens F.

Water Sci Technol. 2012;65(12):2219-27. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.134.

PMID:
22643419
16.

Impact of rainfall data resolution in time and space on the urban flooding evaluation.

Notaro V, Fontanazza CM, Freni G, Puleo V.

Water Sci Technol. 2013;68(9):1984-93. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.435.

PMID:
24225098
17.

Land-use change and floods: what do we need most, research or management?

Tollan A.

Water Sci Technol. 2002;45(8):183-90.

PMID:
12019819
18.

Assessment of flood hazard in a combined sewer system in Reykjavik city centre.

Hlodversdottir AO, Bjornsson B, Andradottir HO, Eliasson J, Crochet P.

Water Sci Technol. 2015;71(10):1471-7. doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.119.

PMID:
26442488
19.

An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast.

Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T, Vanneuville W, De Maeyer P.

Risk Anal. 2011 Jul;31(7):1055-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01571.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.

PMID:
21231949
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center