Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Tension of knotted surgical sutures shows tissue specific rapid loss in a rodent model.

Klink CD, Binnebösel M, Alizai HP, Lambertz A, Vontrotha KT, Junker E, Disselhorst-Klug C, Neumann UP, Klinge U.

BMC Surg. 2011 Dec 21;11:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-36.

2.

Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture.

Hennessey DB, Carey E, Simms CK, Hanly A, Winter DC.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012 Aug;12:168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

PMID:
22762905
3.

[DIN-oriented tensile strength evaluation of surgical tissue sutures].

Bücheler M.

Chirurg. 1999 Mar;70(3):316-20. German.

PMID:
10230549
4.

Experimental study of the characteristics of a novel mesh suture.

Dumanian GA, Tulaimat A, Dumanian ZP.

Br J Surg. 2015 Sep;102(10):1285-92. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9853. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

5.

An innovative method to evaluate the suture compliance in sealing the surgical wound lips.

Saleh F, Palmieri B, Lodi D, Al-Sebeih K.

Int J Med Sci. 2008;5(6):354-60. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

6.

Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.

Van Winkle W Jr, Hastings JC, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W.

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Jan;140(1):7-12.

PMID:
1108243
7.

New suture materials for midline laparotomy closure: an experimental study.

Bellón JM, Pérez-López P, Simón-Allue R, Sotomayor S, Pérez-Köhler B, Peña E, Pascual G, Calvo B.

BMC Surg. 2014 Sep 17;14:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-70.

8.

In vivo knot scoring model for a multifilament suture.

Bargon RM, Odermatt EK, Menne D.

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):e120-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821a8596.

PMID:
21654282
9.

Influence of suture tension to the tearing characteristics of the soft tissues: an in vitro experiment.

Burkhardt R, Preiss A, Joss A, Lang NP.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):314-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01352.x. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

PMID:
18177431
10.

[Experimental in vitro studies of the stability of tendon sutures].

Schulz-Gebhard B, Havemann D.

Aktuelle Traumatol. 1991 Aug;21(4):153-6. German.

PMID:
1681702
11.
12.

Influence of laparotomy closure technique on collagen synthesis in the incisional region.

Höer JJ, Junge K, Schachtrupp A, Klinge U, Schumpelick V.

Hernia. 2002 Sep;6(3):93-8. Epub 2002 Jul 20.

PMID:
12209295
13.

Influence of suture technique on laparotomy wound healing: an experimental study in the rat.

Höer J, Klinge U, Schachtrupp A, Töns C, Schumpelick V.

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;386(3):218-23.

PMID:
11382325
14.

Modified closure technique for reducing sternal dehiscence; a clinical and in vitro assessment.

John LC.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 May;33(5):769-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.026. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

PMID:
18313320
15.

Principles of abdominal wound closure. II. Prevention of wound dehiscence.

Sanders RJ, DiClementi D.

Arch Surg. 1977 Oct;112(10):1188-91.

PMID:
334112
16.

Strength comparison of mitral annuloplasty ring and suturing combinations: an in-vitro study.

Spratt JR, Spratt JA, Beachley V, Kang Q.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2012 May;21(3):286-92.

PMID:
22808827
17.

Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.

Kon ND, Meredith JW, Poole GV Jr, Martin MB, Kawamoto E, Myers RT.

Am Surg. 1984 Oct;50(10):549-51.

PMID:
6237599
19.

Force sensing in surgical sutures.

Horeman T, Meijer EJ, Harlaar JJ, Lange JF, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Dankelman J.

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e84466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084466. eCollection 2013.

Supplemental Content

Support Center