Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Recognizing chronological bias for what it is.

Berger VW.

Clin Trials. 2011 Dec;8(6):768; author reply 769. doi: 10.1177/1740774511423949. No abstract available.

PMID:
22167114
2.

On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.

Shahar E, Shahar DJ.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1214-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01347.x.

PMID:
20367730
3.

Evaluation of randomized controlled trials.

Stanley K.

Circulation. 2007 Apr 3;115(13):1819-22. Review. No abstract available.

4.

A potential bias in safety evaluation during open-label extensions of randomized clinical trials.

Rothman KJ.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 May;13(5):295-8.

PMID:
15133780
5.

Response to comments on 'the use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias'.

Kaizar EE, Vydra TP.

Stat Med. 2014 Feb 10;33(3):538-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.6032. No abstract available.

PMID:
24395075
6.
7.

Sources of bias in clinical trials.

Pandis N.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):595-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.013. No abstract available.

PMID:
21967950
8.

[Roaming through the methodology. XX. Randomization as a means of avoiding confounding through indication].

Zielhuis GA.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Aug 5;144(32):1528-31. Dutch.

PMID:
10949635
9.

Research methodology.

Dunn WR, Lyman S, Marx R; ISAKOS Scientific Committee..

Arthroscopy. 2003 Oct;19(8):870-3. Review.

PMID:
14551552
10.
11.

Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.

Pereira C, Castilho E.

Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Mar 15;169(6):783; author reply 783-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp016. Epub 2009 Feb 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
19208724
12.

Bias: adding to the uncertainty.

Sparrow JM, Thompson JR.

Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;83(6):637-8. No abstract available.

13.

Data dredging, bias, or confounding.

Smith GD, Ebrahim S.

BMJ. 2002 Dec 21;325(7378):1437-8. No abstract available.

14.

Causality in complex interventions.

Rickles D.

Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Mar;12(1):77-90. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9140-4. Epub 2008 May 9. Review.

PMID:
18465202
15.
16.

What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine?

Julian DG.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Suppl):S2-5.

PMID:
12950509
17.

Mega-trials: methodological issues and clinical implications.

Charlton BG.

J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Mar-Apr;29(2):96-100. Review.

PMID:
7595900
18.

[Preparation of data for based on various research--application of statistical methods].

Tango T.

Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1998 May;95(5):412-8. Japanese. No abstract available.

PMID:
9696637
19.

A note on randomization and selection bias in maintenance therapy clinical trials.

Greenhouse JB, Meyer MM.

Psychopharmacol Bull. 1991;27(3):225-9. Review.

PMID:
1775592
20.

Characteristics of good causation studies.

Daya S.

Semin Reprod Med. 2003 Feb;21(1):73-83.

PMID:
12806562

Supplemental Content

Support Center