Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 134

1.

Substitution and pooling in crowding.

Freeman J, Chakravarthi R, Pelli DG.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Feb;74(2):379-96. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0229-0.

2.

Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Ester EF, Zilber E, Serences JT.

J Vis. 2015 Jan 8;15(1):15.1.4. doi: 10.1167/15.1.4.

3.

Supercrowding: weakly masking a target expands the range of crowding.

Vickery TJ, Shim WM, Chakravarthi R, Jiang YV, Luedeman R.

J Vis. 2009 Feb 10;9(2):12.1-15. doi: 10.1167/9.2.12.

PMID:
19271922
4.

Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli.

Greenwood JA, Bex PJ, Dakin SC.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13130-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901352106. Epub 2009 Jul 16.

5.

Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification.

Chanceaux M, Mathôt S, Grainger J.

J Vis. 2014 Nov 10;14(6). pii: 7. doi: 10.1167/14.6.7.

PMID:
25384390
6.

Whole report uncovers correctly identified but incorrectly placed target information under visual crowding.

Zhang JY, Zhang GL, Liu L, Yu C.

J Vis. 2012 Jul 10;12(7). pii: 5. doi: 10.1167/12.7.5.

PMID:
22782439
7.

A crowdful of letters: disentangling the role of similarity, eccentricity and spatial frequencies in letter crowding.

Zahabi S, Arguin M.

Vision Res. 2014 Apr;97:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

8.

Source confusion is a major cause of crowding.

Strasburger H, Malania M.

J Vis. 2013 Jan 18;13(1):24. doi: 10.1167/13.1.24. Erratum in: J Vis. 2014;14(1):31.

PMID:
23335321
9.

Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.

Ester EF, Klee D, Awh E.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):1022-33. doi: 10.1037/a0035377. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

10.

Perceptual learning eases crowding by reducing recognition errors but not position errors.

Xiong YZ, Yu C, Zhang JY.

J Vis. 2015 Aug 1;15(11):16. doi: 10.1167/15.11.16.

PMID:
26317323
11.

Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: determining the locus of feature integration.

Chakravarthi R, Cavanagh P.

J Vis. 2009 Sep 4;9(10):4.1-9. doi: 10.1167/9.10.4.

12.

Object crowding.

Wallace JM, Tjan BS.

J Vis. 2011 May 25;11(6). pii: 19. doi: 10.1167/11.6.19.

13.

The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target-flanker similarity.

Bernard JB, Chung ST.

J Vis. 2011 Jul 5;11(8). pii: 1. doi: 10.1167/11.8.1.

14.

Prominent effects and neural correlates of visual crowding in a neurodegenerative disease population.

Yong KX, Shakespeare TJ, Cash D, Henley SM, Nicholas JM, Ridgway GR, Golden HL, Warrington EK, Carton AM, Kaski D, Schott JM, Warren JD, Crutch SJ.

Brain. 2014 Dec;137(Pt 12):3284-99. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu293. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Erratum in: Brain. 2015 Apr;138(Pt 4):e345.

15.

Crowding by invisible flankers.

Ho C, Cheung SH.

PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028814. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

16.

The effect of aging on crowded letter recognition in the peripheral visual field.

Astle AT, Blighe AJ, Webb BS, McGraw PV.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 1;55(8):5039-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14181.

17.

Crowding with detection and coarse discrimination of simple visual features.

Põder E.

J Vis. 2008 Apr 24;8(4):24.1-6. doi: 10.1167/8.4.24.

PMID:
18484863
18.

The allocation of attention and working memory in visual crowding.

Bacigalupo F, Luck SJ.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1180-93. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00771. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

19.

The effect of spacing regularity on visual crowding.

Saarela TP, Westheimer G, Herzog MH.

J Vis. 2010 Aug 18;10(10):17. doi: 10.1167/10.10.17.

PMID:
20884482
20.

The Bouma law of crowding, revised: critical spacing is equal across parts, not objects.

Rosen S, Chakravarthi R, Pelli DG.

J Vis. 2014 Dec 10;14(6):10. doi: 10.1167/14.6.10.

Supplemental Content

Support Center