Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 140

1.

Improving detection of adolescent hearing loss.

Sekhar DL, Rhoades JA, Longenecker AL, Beiler JS, King TS, Widome MD, Paul IM.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Dec;165(12):1094-100. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.188.

PMID:
22147776
2.
3.

Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.

Jansen S, Luts H, Dejonckere P, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.

Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):773-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318297920b.

PMID:
23782715
4.

Slight-mild sensorineural hearing loss in children: audiometric, clinical, and risk factor profiles.

Cone BK, Wake M, Tobin S, Poulakis Z, Rickards FW.

Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):202-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c62263.

PMID:
20054279
5.

Assessment of the efficacy of a hearing screening program for college students.

Taylor EJ, Emanuel DC.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(7):607-15. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.7.9.

PMID:
24047948
6.

Pilot study of a high-frequency school-based hearing screen to detect adolescent hearing loss.

Sekhar DL, Zalewski TR, Ghossaini SN, King TS, Rhoades JA, Czarnecki B, Grounds S, Deese B, Barr AL, Paul IM.

J Med Screen. 2014 Mar;21(1):18-23. doi: 10.1177/0969141314524565. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

PMID:
24523012
7.
8.

A multicenter study on the audiometric findings of styrene-exposed workers.

Morata TC, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Johnson AC, Starck J, Pawlas K, Zamyslowska-Szmytke E, Nylen P, Toppila E, Krieg E, Pawlas N, Prasher D.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Oct;50(10):652-60. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.588965. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

PMID:
21812635
9.

Pure-tone hearing asymmetry: a logistic approach modeling age, sex, and noise exposure history.

Zapala DA, Criter RE, Bogle JM, Lundy LB, Cevette MJ, Bauch CD.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;23(7):553-70.

PMID:
22992262
10.

Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population.

Blanchet C, Pommie C, Mondain M, Berr C, Hillaire D, Puel JL.

Otol Neurotol. 2008 Jun;29(4):432-40. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181719746.

PMID:
18520580
11.

Risk factors for hearing loss at different frequencies in a population of 47,388 noise-exposed workers.

Bauer P, K├Ârpert K, Neuberger M, Raber A, Schwetz F.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Dec;90(6):3086-98.

PMID:
1787247
13.

Results from high-frequency hearing screening in 14- to 15-year old adolescents and their relation to self-reported exposure to loud music.

Weichbold V, Holzer A, Newesely G, Stephan K.

Int J Audiol. 2012 Sep;51(9):650-4. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.679747. Epub 2012 May 10.

PMID:
22571517
14.

Objective assessment of auditory thresholds in noise-induced hearing loss using steady-state evoked potentials.

Hsu WC, Wu HP, Liu TC.

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Jun;28(3):195-8.

PMID:
12755754
16.

Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians.

Phillips SL, Henrich VC, Mace ST.

Int J Audiol. 2010 Apr;49(4):309-16. doi: 10.3109/14992020903470809.

PMID:
20233141
17.

Prevalence of hearing disorders in Singapore military conscripts: a role for routine audiometry screening?

Toh ST, Lu P, Ong M, Seet B.

Singapore Med J. 2002 Dec;43(12):622-7.

PMID:
12693766
18.

Effect of recreational noise exposure on hearing impairment among teenage students.

Tung CY, Chao KP.

Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

PMID:
22940166
19.

Hypoacusis among the Polar Eskimos of northwest Greenland.

Counter SA, Klareskov B.

Scand Audiol. 1990;19(3):149-60.

PMID:
2237254
20.

Comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population.

Sabo MP, Winston R, Macias JD.

Am J Otol. 2000 Jan;21(1):88-91.

PMID:
10651440

Supplemental Content

Support Center