Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Pulsatile distention of the nondiseased and stenotic aortic valve annulus: analysis with electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography.

de Heer LM, Budde RP, van Prehn J, Mali WP, Bartels LW, Stella PR, van Herwerden LA, Kluin J, Vincken KL.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;93(2):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.068. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

PMID:
22137241
2.

Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Blanke P, Russe M, Leipsic J, Reinöhl J, Ebersberger U, Suranyi P, Siepe M, Pache G, Langer M, Schoepf UJ.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep;5(9):984-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.014.

3.

Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing?

Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, Von Aspern K, Lücke C, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S, Kempfert J, Haensig M, Rastan A, Walther T, Mohr FW, Gutberlet M.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Mar;29(3):693-703. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0123-4. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

4.

Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation.

von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Etz CD, Hoyer A, Girrbach F, Holzhey D, Lücke C, Grothoff M, Linke A, Mohr FW, Gutberlet M, Lehmkuhl L.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;31(1):163-9. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0527-4. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

PMID:
25165022
5.

Automated 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Watanabe Y, Morice MC, Bouvier E, Leong T, Hayashida K, Lefèvre T, Hovasse T, Romano M, Chevalier B, Donzeau-Gouge P, Farge A, Cormier B, Garot P.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):955-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

6.

Aortic root dimensions among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Buellesfeld L, Stortecky S, Kalesan B, Gloekler S, Khattab AA, Nietlispach F, Delfine V, Huber C, Eberle B, Meier B, Wenaweser P, Windecker S.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan;6(1):72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.007.

7.

Oversizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement, a commonly used term but a poorly understood one: dependency on definition and geometrical measurements.

Blanke P, Willson AB, Webb JG, Achenbach S, Piazza N, Min JK, Pache G, Leipsic J.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Jan-Feb;8(1):67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.020. Epub 2014 Jan 12.

PMID:
24582045
8.

Accuracy and reproducibility of aortic annulus sizing using a dedicated three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction tool in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Stortecky S, Heg D, Gloekler S, Wenaweser P, Windecker S, Buellesfeld L.

EuroIntervention. 2014 Jul;10(3):339-46. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I3A59.

9.

Interobserver variability of CT angiography for evaluation of aortic annulus dimensions prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Schmidkonz C, Marwan M, Klinghammer L, Mitschke M, Schuhbaeck A, Arnold M, Lell M, Achenbach S, Pflederer T.

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Sep;83(9):1672-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

PMID:
25022977
10.

Comparison of aortic root measurements in patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT): differences and variability.

Lehmkuhl LH, von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S, Kempfert J, Rastan A, Linke A, Mohr FW, Noettling A, Walther T, Gutberlet M.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;29(2):417-24. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0081-x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

PMID:
22710987
11.

Cyclic changes in area- and perimeter-derived effective dimensions of the aortic annulus measured with multislice computed tomography and comparison with metric intraoperative sizing.

Kim WK, Meyer A, Möllmann H, Rolf A, Möllmann S, Blumenstein J, Van Linden A, Hamm CW, Walther T, Kempfert J.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jul;105(7):622-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-0971-3. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

PMID:
26887376
12.

Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Tzikas A, Schultz CJ, Piazza N, Moelker A, Van Mieghem NM, Nuis RJ, van Geuns RJ, Geleijnse ML, Serruys PW, de Jaegere PP.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):868-75. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22761. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

PMID:
20824762
13.

Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy.

Hamdan A, Guetta V, Konen E, Goitein O, Segev A, Raanani E, Spiegelstein D, Hay I, Di Segni E, Eldar M, Schwammenthal E.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 10;59(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.045.

14.

Automated 3D analysis of multislice computed tomography to define the line of perpendicularity of the aortic annulus and of the implanted valve: benefit on planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Samin M, Juthier F, Van Belle C, Agostoni P, Kluin J, Stella PR, Ramjankhan F, Budde RP, Sieswerda G, Algeri E, Elkalioubie A, Belkacemi A, Bertrand ME, Doevendans PA, Van Belle E.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):E119-27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24947. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

PMID:
23592336
15.

Automated 3D analysis of pre-procedural MDCT to predict annulus plane angulation and C-arm positioning: benefit on procedural outcome in patients referred for TAVR.

Samim M, Stella PR, Agostoni P, Kluin J, Ramjankhan F, Budde RP, Sieswerda G, Algeri E, van Belle C, Elkalioubie A, Juthier F, Belkacemi A, Bertrand ME, Doevendans PA, Van Belle E.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;6(2):238-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.12.004.

16.

Impact of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography on prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Husser O, Rauch S, Endemann DH, Resch M, Nunez J, Bodi V, Hilker M, Schmid C, Riegger GA, Luchner A, Hengstenberg C.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 15;80(6):956-63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23459. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

PMID:
22419651
17.

Preoperative quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison of 64-slice computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and size of implanted prosthesis.

Mizia-Stec K, Pysz P, Jasiński M, Adamczyk T, Drzewiecka-Gerber A, Chmiel A, Krejca M, Bochenek A, Woś S, Sosnowski M, Gąsior Z, Trusz-Gluza M, Tendera M.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Feb;28(2):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9784-z. Epub 2011 Jan 30.

18.

Dynamism of the aortic annulus: Effect of diastolic versus systolic CT annular measurements on device selection in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Murphy DT, Blanke P, Alaamri S, Naoum C, Rubinshtein R, Pache G, Precious B, Berger A, Raju R, Dvir D, Wood DA, Webb J, Leipsic JA.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jan-Feb;10(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

PMID:
26239964
19.

Three dimensional evaluation of the aortic annulus using multislice computer tomography: are manufacturer's guidelines for sizing for percutaneous aortic valve replacement helpful?

Schultz CJ, Moelker A, Piazza N, Tzikas A, Otten A, Nuis RJ, Neefjes LA, van Geuns RJ, de Feyter P, Krestin G, Serruys PW, de Jaegere PP.

Eur Heart J. 2010 Apr;31(7):849-56. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp534. Epub 2009 Dec 7.

PMID:
19995874
20.

Multidetector CT predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Freeman M, Webb JG, Willson AB, Wheeler M, Blanke P, Moss RR, Thompson CR, Munt B, Norgaard BL, Yang TH, Min JK, Poulsen S, Hansson NC, Binder RK, Toggweiler S, Hague C, Wood DA, Pibarot P, Leipsic J.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Jul-Aug;7(4):248-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

PMID:
24148778

Supplemental Content

Support Center