Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 148

1.

The structure of genealogies in the presence of purifying selection: a fitness-class coalescent.

Walczak AM, Nicolaisen LE, Plotkin JB, Desai MM.

Genetics. 2012 Feb;190(2):753-79. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.134544. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

2.

Distortions in genealogies due to purifying selection.

Nicolaisen LE, Desai MM.

Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Nov;29(11):3589-600. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss170. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

PMID:
22729750
3.

Distortions in genealogies due to purifying selection and recombination.

Nicolaisen LE, Desai MM.

Genetics. 2013 Sep;195(1):221-30. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.152983. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

4.

Genetic diversity and the structure of genealogies in rapidly adapting populations.

Desai MM, Walczak AM, Fisher DS.

Genetics. 2013 Feb;193(2):565-85. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.147157. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

5.

The structure of allelic diversity in the presence of purifying selection.

Desai MM, Nicolaisen LE, Walczak AM, Plotkin JB.

Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Mar;81(2):144-57. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

6.

A continuous-state coalescent and the impact of weak selection on the structure of gene genealogies.

O'Fallon BD, Seger J, Adler FR.

Mol Biol Evol. 2010 May;27(5):1162-72. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq006. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

7.

The joint effects of background selection and genetic recombination on local gene genealogies.

Zeng K, Charlesworth B.

Genetics. 2011 Sep;189(1):251-66. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130575. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

8.

The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Zeng K, Corcoran P.

Genetics. 2015 Dec;201(4):1539-54. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178558. Epub 2015 Oct 4.

9.

The effect of selection on genealogies.

Barton NH, Etheridge AM.

Genetics. 2004 Feb;166(2):1115-31.

10.

The effect of fluctuating selection on the genealogy at a linked site.

Taylor JE.

Theor Popul Biol. 2013 Aug;87:34-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

PMID:
23583270
11.

The genealogical consequences of fecundity variance polymorphism.

Taylor JE.

Genetics. 2009 Jul;182(3):813-37. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.102368. Epub 2009 May 11.

12.

Genealogies and weak purifying selection.

Przeworski M, Charlesworth B, Wall JD.

Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Feb;16(2):246-52.

PMID:
10084898
13.

How to infer relative fitness from a sample of genomic sequences.

Dayarian A, Shraiman BI.

Genetics. 2014 Jul;197(3):913-23. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.160986. Epub 2014 Apr 26.

14.

Coalescence and genetic diversity in sexual populations under selection.

Neher RA, Kessinger TA, Shraiman BI.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 24;110(39):15836-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309697110. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

15.

The coalescent process in models with selection.

Kaplan NL, Darden T, Hudson RR.

Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):819-29.

16.

The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites.

Williamson S, Orive ME.

Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Aug;19(8):1376-84.

PMID:
12140250
17.

Evolution of the human immunodeficiency virus envelope gene is dominated by purifying selection.

Edwards CT, Holmes EC, Pybus OG, Wilson DJ, Viscidi RP, Abrams EJ, Phillips RE, Drummond AJ.

Genetics. 2006 Nov;174(3):1441-53. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

18.

Coalescent size versus coalescent time with strong selection.

Campbell RB.

Bull Math Biol. 2007 Oct;69(7):2249-59. Epub 2007 Jun 2.

PMID:
17546476
19.

A method for accurate inference of population size from serially sampled genealogies distorted by selection.

O'Fallon BD.

Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Nov;28(11):3171-81. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr153. Epub 2011 Jun 16.

20.

Approximating the coalescent with recombination.

McVean GA, Cardin NJ.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 29;360(1459):1387-93.

Supplemental Content

Support Center