Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 91

1.

Population screening for barrett esophagus: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Chang JY, Talley NJ, Locke GR 3rd, Katzka DA, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Dunagan KT, Wu TT, Wang KK, Prasad GA.

Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Dec;86(12):1174-80. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0396.

2.

A randomized comparative effectiveness trial of novel endoscopic techniques and approaches for Barrett's esophagus screening in the community.

Sami SS, Dunagan KT, Johnson ML, Schleck CD, Shah ND, Zinsmeister AR, Wongkeesong LM, Wang KK, Katzka DA, Ragunath K, Iyer PG.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):148-58. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.362. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

3.

Screening for Barrett's esophagus: results from a population-based survey.

Gupta M, Beebe TJ, Dunagan KT, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ, Locke GR 3rd, Iyer PG.

Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Aug;59(8):1831-50. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3092-8. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

4.

Unsedated Transnasal Endoscopy (uTNE): Not Quite Ready to Replace Sedated Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (sEGD).

Syed A, Kyprianou A.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;110(6):936-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.121. No abstract available.

PMID:
26052774
5.

Costs associated with Barrett's esophagus screening in the community: an economic analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial of sedated versus hospital unsedated versus mobile community unsedated endoscopy.

Moriarty JP, Shah ND, Rubenstein JH, Blevins CH, Johnson M, Katzka DA, Wang KK, Wongkeesong LM, Ahlquist DA, Iyer PG.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr 25. pii: S0016-5107(17)31821-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.019. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
28455158
6.

Feasibility and safety of string, wireless capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.

Ramirez FC, Shaukat MS, Young MA, Johnson DA, Akins R.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 May;61(6):741-6.

PMID:
15855985
7.

Screening of Barrett's esophagus with string-capsule endoscopy: a prospective blinded study of 100 consecutive patients using histology as the criterion standard.

Ramirez FC, Akins R, Shaukat M.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jul;68(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.040. Epub 2008 May 21.

PMID:
18499107
8.

Cost utility of screening for Barrett's esophagus with esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy.

Rubenstein JH, Inadomi JM, Brill JV, Eisen GM.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;5(3):312-8.

PMID:
17368230
9.
10.

Esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett's esophagus screening: a hard pill to swallow?

Hur C.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;5(3):307-9. Epub 2007 Jan 25. No abstract available.

PMID:
17257904
11.

Comparative acceptability of transnasal esophagoscopy and esophageal capsule esophagoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial in veterans.

Chak A, Alashkar BM, Isenberg GA, Chandar AK, Greer KB, Hepner A, Pulice RD, Vemana S, Falck-Ytter Y, Faulx AL.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Nov;80(5):774-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.04.034. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

12.

String capsule endoscopy: a viable method for screening for Barrett's esophagus?

Weston AP.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jul;68(1):32-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.002. No abstract available.

PMID:
18577473
13.

Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video).

Peery AF, Hoppo T, Garman KS, Dellon ES, Daugherty N, Bream S, Sanz AF, Davison J, Spacek M, Connors D, Faulx AL, Chak A, Luketich JD, Shaheen NJ, Jobe BA; Barrett's Esophagus Risk Consortium.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 May;75(5):945-953.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.021. Epub 2012 Mar 16.

14.

Esophageal capsule endoscopy for evaluation of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: findings and its image quality.

Chavalitdhamrong D, Chen GC, Roth BE, Goltzer O, Sul J, Jutabha R.

Dis Esophagus. 2011 Jul;24(5):295-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01136.x. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

PMID:
21668569
15.

Barrett's esophagus in children and adolescents without neurodevelopmental or tracheoesophageal abnormalities: a prospective study.

Nguyen DM, El-Serag HB, Shub M, Integlia M, Henderson L, Richardson P, Fairly K, Gilger MA.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):875-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.017. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

16.

Office-based unsedated small-caliber endoscopy is equivalent to conventional sedated endoscopy in screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: a randomized and blinded comparison.

Jobe BA, Hunter JG, Chang EY, Kim CY, Eisen GM, Robinson JD, Diggs BS, O'Rourke RW, Rader AE, Schipper P, Sauer DA, Peters JH, Lieberman DA, Morris CD.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2693-703.

PMID:
17227516
17.
18.

Randomized trial of argon plasma coagulation versus endoscopic surveillance for barrett esophagus after antireflux surgery: late results.

Bright T, Watson DI, Tam W, Game PA, Astill D, Ackroyd R, Wijnhoven BP, Devitt PG, Schoeman MN.

Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1016-20.

PMID:
18043104
19.

Unsedated transnasal endoscopy with ultrathin endoscope as a screening tool for research studies.

Siwiec RM, Dua K, Surapaneni SN, Hafeezullah M, Massey B, Shaker R.

Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1719-23. doi: 10.1002/lary.23304. Epub 2012 May 7.

20.

The safety of combined sedation with propofol plus fentanyl for endoscopy screening and endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients.

Mao W, Wei XQ, Tao J, Zhen FP, Wen ZF, Wu B.

J Dig Dis. 2014 Mar;15(3):124-30. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12115.

PMID:
24224839

Supplemental Content

Support Center