Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 292

1.

Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating.

Winn AA, Elle E, Kalisz S, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Goodwillie C, Johnston MO, Moeller DA, Ree RH, Sargent RD, Vallejo-Marín M.

Evolution. 2011 Dec;65(12):3339-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01462.x. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

PMID:
22133210
2.
3.

Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating-system diversity in hermaphrodites.

Harder LD, Richards SA, Routley MB.

Evolution. 2008 Jan;62(1):157-72. Epub 2007 Dec 6.

PMID:
18067573
4.

Lifetime inbreeding depression, purging, and mating system evolution in a simultaneous hermaphrodite tapeworm.

Benesh DP, Weinreich F, Kalbe M, Milinski M.

Evolution. 2014 Jun;68(6):1762-74. doi: 10.1111/evo.12388. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

PMID:
24611487
5.

Inbreeding depression under mixed outcrossing, self-fertilization and sib-mating.

Porcher E, Lande R.

BMC Evol Biol. 2016 May 17;16:105. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0668-2.

6.

Reproductive compensation in the evolution of plant mating systems.

Porcher E, Lande R.

New Phytol. 2005 May;166(2):673-84.

7.
8.

Patterns of mating-system evolution in hermaphroditic animals: correlations among selfing rate, inbreeding depression, and the timing of reproduction.

Escobar JS, Auld JR, Correa AC, Alonso JM, Bony YK, Coutellec MA, Koene JM, Pointier JP, Jarne P, David P.

Evolution. 2011 May;65(5):1233-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01218.x. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

PMID:
21521187
9.

Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants.

Johnston MO, Porcher E, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Elle E, Geber MA, Kalisz S, Kelly JK, Moeller DA, Vallejo-Marín M, Winn AA.

Am Nat. 2009 Jan;173(1):1-11. doi: 10.1086/593705.

PMID:
19055444
10.
11.

Severe outbreeding and inbreeding depression maintain mating system differentiation in Epipactis (Orchidaceae).

Brys R, Jacquemyn H.

J Evol Biol. 2016 Feb;29(2):352-9. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12787. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

PMID:
26548440
13.
14.

Functional pleiotropy and mating system evolution in plants: frequency-independent mating.

Jordan CY, Otto SP.

Evolution. 2012 Apr;66(4):957-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01513.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14. Erratum in: Evolution. 2012 Sep;66(9):2992.

PMID:
22486682
16.

EVOLUTION OF THE MAGNITUDE AND TIMING OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS.

Husband BC, Schemske DW.

Evolution. 1996 Feb;50(1):54-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04472.x.

PMID:
28568860
17.

The role of natural enemies in the expression and evolution of mixed mating in hermaphroditic plants and animals.

Steets JA, Wolf DE, Auld JR, Ashman TL.

Evolution. 2007 Sep;61(9):2043-55. Review.

PMID:
17767581
18.

The genetic consequences of fluctuating inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant selfing rates.

Porcher E, Kelly JK, Cheptou PO, Eckert CG, Johnston MO, Kalisz S.

J Evol Biol. 2009 Apr;22(4):708-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01705.x. Epub 2009 Feb 18.

19.
20.

Effect of recurrent selfing on inbreeding depression and mating system evolution in an autopolyploid plant.

Ozimec B, Husband BC.

Evolution. 2011 Jul;65(7):2038-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01259.x. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

PMID:
21729058

Supplemental Content

Support Center