Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 68

1.

Fatigue and wear of dental materials.

Reid CN, Fisher J, Jacobsen PH.

J Dent. 1990 Aug;18(4):209-15. Review.

PMID:
2212204
2.

[Mechanisms and theory of occlusal wear].

Pallav P, de Gee AJ.

Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1996 Nov;103(11):452-4. Dutch.

PMID:
11921989
3.

The comparison of wear characteristics of prosthodontic restorative materials.

Duymus ZY, G├╝ldag MU.

Int Dent J. 2003 Feb;53(1):33-6.

PMID:
12653337
4.

Surface contact fatigue and flexural fatigue of dental restorative materials.

McCabe JF, Wang Y, Braem M.

J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Jun 5;50(3):375-80.

PMID:
10737879
5.

Wear of dental resin composites: insights into underlying processes and assessment methods--a review.

Turssi CP, De Moraes Purquerio B, Serra MC.

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003 May 15;65(2):280-5. Review.

PMID:
12687721
6.

Wear and hardness of different core build-up materials.

Schmage P, Nergiz I, Sito F, Platzer U, Rosentritt M.

J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Oct;91(1):71-9. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31375.

PMID:
19402146
7.

Evaluation of test protocol variables for dental implant fatigue research.

Lee CK, Karl M, Kelly JR.

Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

PMID:
19646746
8.

In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.

Shabanian M, Richards LC.

J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jun;87(6):650-6. Erratum in: J Prosthet Dent 2002 Nov;88(5):554.

PMID:
12131888
9.

Fatigue of packable dental composites.

Papadogiannis Y, Lakes RS, Palaghias G, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Papadogiannis D.

Dent Mater. 2007 Feb;23(2):235-42. Epub 2006 Feb 21.

PMID:
16490246
10.
11.

A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.

Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V.

Dent Mater. 2006 Nov;22(11):1051-62. Epub 2005 Dec 28.

PMID:
16386293
12.

Comparison of two methods for measuring generalized wear of dental materials.

Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y.

J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1994 Dec;34:1-8.

PMID:
8935088
13.

Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing.

Shortall AC, Hu XQ, Marquis PM.

Dent Mater. 2002 May;18(3):246-54.

PMID:
11823017
14.

Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.

Heintze SD, Zellweger G, Cavalleri A, Ferracane J.

Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):166-75. Epub 2005 Aug 8.

PMID:
16087228
15.

How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods.

Lambrechts P, Debels E, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B.

Dent Mater. 2006 Aug;22(8):693-701. Epub 2006 May 18. Review.

PMID:
16712913
16.

Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop.

Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH.

J Dent. 1996 Jan-Mar;24(1-2):141-8.

PMID:
8636486
17.

How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods.

Heintze SD.

Dent Mater. 2006 Aug;22(8):712-34. Epub 2006 Mar 30. Review.

PMID:
16574212
18.

Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.

Gil FJ, Aparicio C, Manero JM, Padros A.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):583-90.

PMID:
19885397
19.

Wear test combining simulated occlusal wear and toothbrush wear.

Wakamatsu Y, Kakuta K, Ogura H.

Dent Mater J. 2003 Sep;22(3):383-96.

20.

Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.

Cohen BI, Volovich Y, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS.

Gen Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct;49(5):484-8.

PMID:
12017792

Supplemental Content

Support Center