Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Factors contributing to variability of quantitative viral PCR results in proficiency testing samples: a multivariate analysis.

Hayden RT, Yan X, Wick MT, Rodriguez AB, Xiong X, Ginocchio CC, Mitchell MJ, Caliendo AM; College of American Pathologists Microbiology Resource Committee.

J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Feb;50(2):337-45. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01287-11. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

2.

Marked variability of BK virus load measurement using quantitative real-time PCR among commonly used assays.

Hoffman NG, Cook L, Atienza EE, Limaye AP, Jerome KR.

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Aug;46(8):2671-80. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00258-08. Epub 2008 Jun 18.

3.

Multicenter comparison of laboratory performance in cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus viral load testing using international standards.

Rychert J, Danziger-Isakov L, Yen-Lieberman B, Storch G, Buller R, Sweet SC, Mehta AK, Cheeseman JA, Heeger P, Rosenberg ES, Fishman JA.

Clin Transplant. 2014 Dec;28(12):1416-23. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12473. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

4.

Cellular normalization of viral DNA loads on whole blood improves the clinical management of cytomegalovirus or Epstein Barr virus infections in the setting of pre-emptive therapy.

Bressollette-Bodin C, Coste-Burel M, Besse B, André-Garnier E, Ferre V, Imbert-Marcille BM.

J Med Virol. 2009 Jan;81(1):90-8. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21334.

PMID:
19031462
5.

[Evaluation of the LightCycler 480 real-time PCR system for the measurement of CMV, EBV, HHV-6 and BKV viral loads in whole blood].

Boutolleau D, Deback C, Géli J, Aït-Arkoub Z, Angleraud F, Gautheret-Dejean A, Agut H.

Pathol Biol (Paris). 2010 Apr;58(2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Nov 4. French.

PMID:
19892483
6.

Anchor-based fluorescent amplicon generation assays (FLAG) for real-time measurement of human cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and varicella-zoster virus viral loads.

Di Nicola A, Ghezzi E, Gillio F, Zerilli F, Shehi E, Maritano D, Panizzo M, Bonelli F, Adlerstein D.

Clin Chem. 2008 Nov;54(11):1900-7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.106542. Epub 2008 Aug 14.

7.

Use of the Roche LightCycler 480 system in a routine laboratory setting for molecular diagnosis of opportunistic viral infections: Evaluation on whole blood specimens and proficiency panels.

Deback C, Géli J, Aït-Arkoub Z, Angleraud F, Gautheret-Dejean A, Agut H, Boutolleau D.

J Virol Methods. 2009 Aug;159(2):291-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.03.027. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

PMID:
19490982
8.

Multi-Site PCR-based CMV viral load assessment-assays demonstrate linearity and precision, but lack numeric standardization: a report of the association for molecular pathology.

Wolff DJ, Heaney DL, Neuwald PD, Stellrecht KA, Press RD.

J Mol Diagn. 2009 Mar;11(2):87-92. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080097.

9.

Multicenter evaluation of prototype real-time PCR assays for Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus DNA in whole blood samples from transplant recipients.

Ito Y, Takakura S, Ichiyama S, Ueda M, Ando Y, Matsuda K, Hidaka E, Nakatani K, Nishioka J, Nobori T, Kajiyama N, Kimura H.

Microbiol Immunol. 2010 Sep;54(9):516-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00243.x.

10.
11.

Multicenter comparison of different real-time PCR assays for quantitative detection of Epstein-Barr virus.

Hayden RT, Hokanson KM, Pounds SB, Bankowski MJ, Belzer SW, Carr J, Diorio D, Forman MS, Joshi Y, Hillyard D, Hodinka RL, Nikiforova MN, Romain CA, Stevenson J, Valsamakis A, Balfour HH Jr; U.S. EBV Working Group.

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jan;46(1):157-63. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

12.

Interlaboratory comparison of epstein-barr virus viral load assays.

Preiksaitis JK, Pang XL, Fox JD, Fenton JM, Caliendo AM, Miller GG; American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice.

Am J Transplant. 2009 Feb;9(2):269-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02514.x.

13.

Evaluation of a BK virus viral load assay using the QIAGEN Artus BK Virus RG PCR test.

Rennert H, Jenkins SG, Azurin C, Sipley J.

J Clin Virol. 2012 Jul;54(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 10.

PMID:
22494899
14.

Interlaboratory comparison of cytomegalovirus viral load assays.

Pang XL, Fox JD, Fenton JM, Miller GG, Caliendo AM, Preiksaitis JK; American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice; Canadian Society of Transplantation.

Am J Transplant. 2009 Feb;9(2):258-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02513.x.

15.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for evaluating DNAemia due to cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and BK virus in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Smith TF, Espy MJ, Mandrekar J, Jones MF, Cockerill FR, Patel R.

Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 15;45(8):1056-61. Epub 2007 Sep 12. Review.

PMID:
17879925
16.

Epstein Barr viral load monitoring by quantitative PCR in renal transplant patients.

Merlino C, Cavallo R, Bergallo M, Giacchino F, Bollero C, Negro Ponzi A, Cavallo G.

New Microbiol. 2003 Apr;26(2):141-9.

PMID:
12737195
17.

Multicentric evaluation of a new commercial cytomegalovirus real-time PCR quantitation assay.

Gouarin S, Vabret A, Scieux C, Agbalika F, Cherot J, Mengelle C, Deback C, Petitjean J, Dina J, Freymuth F.

J Virol Methods. 2007 Dec;146(1-2):147-54. Epub 2007 Jul 27.

PMID:
17673304
19.

Comparison of commercial real-time PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA.

Ruiz G, Peña P, de Ory F, Echevarría JE.

J Clin Microbiol. 2005 May;43(5):2053-7.

20.

Progress in Quantitative Viral Load Testing: Variability and Impact of the WHO Quantitative International Standards.

Hayden RT, Sun Y, Tang L, Procop GW, Hillyard DR, Pinsky BA, Young SA, Caliendo AM.

J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Feb;55(2):423-430. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02044-16. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

PMID:
27852673

Supplemental Content

Support Center