Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 66

1.

Measuring the Relevance of Evaluation Criteria among Health Information Seekers on the Internet.

Barnes MD, Penrod C, Neiger BL, Merrill RM, Thackeray R, Eggett DL, Thomas E.

J Health Psychol. 2003 Jan;8(1):71-82. doi: 10.1177/1359105303008001436.

PMID:
22113902
2.

How to evaluate the quality of health related websites.

Gattoni F, Sicola C.

Radiol Med. 2005 Mar;109(3):280-7. English, Italian.

PMID:
15775897
3.
4.

Web evaluation at the US National Institutes of Health: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index online customer survey.

Wood FB, Siegel ER, Feldman S, Love CB, Rodrigues D, Malamud M, Lagana M, Crafts J.

J Med Internet Res. 2008 Feb 15;10(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.944.

5.

A review of web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATIs).

Bock BC, Graham AL, Whiteley JA, Stoddard JL.

J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 6;10(5):e39. doi: 10.2196/jmir.989. Review.

6.

Bandwidth constraints to using video and other rich media in behavior change websites.

Danaher BG, Jazdzewski SA, McKay HG, Hudson CR.

J Med Internet Res. 2005 Sep 16;7(4):e49.

7.

MedCIRCLE: collaboration for Internet rating, certification, labelling and evaluation of health information on the World-Wide-Web.

Mayer MA, Darmoni SJ, Fiene M, Köhler C, Roth-Berghofer TR, Eysenbach G.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:667-72.

PMID:
14664064
8.

Quality of Web-based information on cocaine addiction.

Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Cochand S, Zullino D.

Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

PMID:
18423952
9.

Use of Internet audience measurement data to gauge market share for online health information services.

Wood FB, Benson D, LaCroix EM, Siegel ER, Fariss S.

J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jul 1;7(3):e31.

10.

Surfing for mouth guards: assessing quality of online information.

Magunacelaya MB, Glendor U.

Dent Traumatol. 2011 Oct;27(5):334-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01017.x. Epub 2011 Jun 3.

PMID:
21635690
11.

Quality of information on emergency contraception on the Internet.

Latthe M, Latthe PM, Charlton R.

Br J Fam Plann. 2000 Jan;26(1):39-43.

PMID:
10781966
12.

Evaluating the quality of websites offering information on female hypoactive sexual desire disorder.

Touchet BK, Warnock JK, Yates WR, Wilkins KM.

J Sex Marital Ther. 2007 Jul-Sep;33(4):329-42.

PMID:
17541851
13.

User information seeking behaviour: perceptions and reality. An evaluation of the WHO Labresources Internet portal.

Madle G, Berger A, Cognat S, Menna S, Kostkova P.

Inform Health Soc Care. 2009 Jan;34(1):30-8. doi: 10.1080/17538150902779204.

PMID:
19306197
14.
15.

Automated assessment of the quality of depression websites.

Griffiths KM, Tang TT, Hawking D, Christensen H.

J Med Internet Res. 2005 Dec 30;7(5):e59.

17.

[Web radiology servers: advices for users, their development and evaluation of the quality of sites].

Rolland Y, Bousquet C, Pouliquen B, Le Beux P, Fresnel A, Chaperon J, Rambeau M, Duvauferrier R.

J Radiol. 1999 Nov;80(11):1533-41. French.

18.

Beacon: a web portal to high-quality mental health websites for use by health professionals and the public.

Christensen H, Murray K, Calear AL, Bennett K, Bennett A, Griffiths KM.

Med J Aust. 2010 Jun 7;192(11 Suppl):S40-4.

PMID:
20528708
19.

The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the World Wide Web.

Griffiths KM, Christensen H.

Med J Aust. 2002 May 20;176 Suppl:S97-S104.

PMID:
12065004
20.

Quality of health information for cervical cancer treatment on the internet.

Selman TJ, Prakash T, Khan KS.

BMC Womens Health. 2006 Jun 20;6:9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center