Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 128

1.

Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice.

Haneuse S, Buist DS, Miglioretti DL, Anderson ML, Carney PA, Onega T, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Smith RA, Sickles EA.

Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):69-79. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111026. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

2.

Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Smith RA, Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Monsees BS, Sickles EA, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Onega TL.

Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):351-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132806. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

3.

Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.

Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):456-63. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13672.

4.

Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Buist DS.

Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

5.

Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, Geller B, Berns EA, Cutter GR, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105. Epub 2009 May 26.

6.

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):72-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101698. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

7.

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Cutter GR, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Abraham LA, Fosse JS, Carney PA.

Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):37-46.

8.

Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.

Miglioretti DL, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham L, Brenner RJ, Carney PA, Bowles EJ, Buist DS, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Dec 19;99(24):1854-63. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

9.

Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.

Th├ęberge I, Chang SL, Vandal N, Daigle JM, Guertin MH, Pelletier E, Brisson J.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):djt461. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt461. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

PMID:
24598715
10.

Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.

Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Anderson ML, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Brenner RJ; National Cancer Institute-sponsored Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):74-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091881. Epub 2010 May 26.

11.

Association between time spent interpreting, level of confidence, and accuracy of screening mammography.

Carney PA, Bogart TA, Geller BM, Haneuse S, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Smith R, Rosenberg R, Yankaskas BC, Onega T, Miglioretti DL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Apr;198(4):970-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6988.

12.

Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?

Henderson LM, Benefield T, Bowling JM, Durham DD, Marsh MW, Schroeder BF, Yankaskas BC.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):903-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12903.

13.

Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.

Barlow WE, Chi C, Carney PA, Taplin SH, D'Orsi C, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1840-50.

14.

Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms.

Geller BM, Bowles EJ, Sohng HY, Brenner RJ, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):361-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1647.

15.

Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships.

Esserman L, Cowley H, Eberle C, Kirkpatrick A, Chang S, Berbaum K, Gale A.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Mar 6;94(5):369-75.

PMID:
11880475
16.

Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.

Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Miglioretti DL, Quale C, Rosenberg RD, Cutter G, Geller B, Bacchetti P, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):358-67.

PMID:
15741572
17.

Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?

Kapp JM, Walker R, Haneuse S, Buist DS, Yankaskas BC.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Nov;124(1):213-22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0812-4. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

18.

When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation.

Miglioretti DL, Gard CC, Carney PA, Onega TL, Buist DS, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM, Elmore JG.

Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):632-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533090070. Epub 2009 Sep 29.

19.

Performance assessment for radiologists interpreting screening mammography.

Woodard DB, Gelfand AE, Barlow WE, Elmore JG.

Stat Med. 2007 Mar 30;26(7):1532-51.

20.

Factors associated with breast screening radiologists' annual mammogram reading volume in Italy.

Morrone D, Giordano L, Artuso F, Bernardi D, Fedato C, Frigerio A, Giorgi D, Naldoni C, Saguatti G, Severi D, Taffurelli M, Terribile D, Ventura L, Bucchi L.

Radiol Med. 2016 Jul;121(7):557-63. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0631-8. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

PMID:
27033475

Supplemental Content

Support Center