Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 357

1.

The biomechanical effect of pedicle screws' insertion angle and position on the superior adjacent segment in 1 segment lumbar fusion.

Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Kang KT, Moon SH, Kim HS, Park JO, Moon ES, Kim BR, Sohn JS, Ko YN, Lee HM.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 1;37(19):1637-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823f2115.

PMID:
22089393
2.

The quantitative assessment of risk factors to overstress at adjacent segments after lumbar fusion: removal of posterior ligaments and pedicle screws.

Kim HJ, Kang KT, Moon SH, Chun HJ, Kim HS, Park JO, Moon ES, Kim BR, Sohn JS, Lee HM.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 1;36(17):1367-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318221a595.

PMID:
21587108
3.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.

Chen CS, Huang CH, Shih SL.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 9;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0538-x.

PMID:
25880231
4.

The influence of facet joint orientation and tropism on the stress at the adjacent segment after lumbar fusion surgery: a biomechanical analysis.

Kim HJ, Kang KT, Son J, Lee CK, Chang BS, Yeom JS.

Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1841-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.038. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

PMID:
25817739
5.

Intradiscal pressure changes with dynamic pedicle screw systems.

Dath R, Sirkett DM, Gheduzzi S, Miles AW.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):241-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180ca7116.

PMID:
18525483
6.

Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.

Gao SG, Lei GH, He HB, Liu H, Xiao WF, Wen T, Liang JY, Li KH.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Nov;15(5):507-14. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE11250. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

PMID:
21780862
7.

Effect of an artificial disc on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study.

Rohlmann A, Mann A, Zander T, Bergmann G.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Jan;18(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0836-1. Epub 2008 Nov 29.

PMID:
19043744
8.

Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum.

Untch C, Liu Q, Hart R.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2376-81.

PMID:
15507798
9.

The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.

Mihara H, Onari K, Cheng BC, David SM, Zdeblick TA.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 1;28(3):235-8.

PMID:
12567023
10.

Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.

Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Sairyo K, Ivanov A, Ebraheim NA, Patel TCh, Goel VK.

Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):659-66. Epub 2006 Oct 10.

PMID:
17088196
11.

Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.

Hongo M, Gay RE, Zhao KD, Ilharreborde B, Huddleston PM, Berglund LJ, An KN, Zhao C.

Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Aug 5.

PMID:
19660990
12.

Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.

Sethi A, Muzumdar AM, Ingalhalikar A, Vaidya R.

Spine J. 2011 Sep;11(9):863-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.06.015. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

PMID:
21802998
13.

Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment.

Cardoso MJ, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson M, Lehman RA, Kuklo TR, Rosner MK.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):2868-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818c63d3.

PMID:
19092616
14.

Biomechanical analysis of fusion segment rigidity upon stress at both the fusion and adjacent segments: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Kim HJ, Kang KT, Chang BS, Lee CK, Kim JW, Yeom JS.

Yonsei Med J. 2014 Sep;55(5):1386-94. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1386.

PMID:
25048501
15.

Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis.

Rohlmann A, Nabil Boustani H, Bergmann G, Zander T.

J Biomech. 2010 Nov 16;43(15):2963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Aug 8.

PMID:
20696430
16.

Biomechanical advantages of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar interbody fusion compared with freehand technique in a prospective randomized controlled trial-perspective for patient-specific finite element analysis.

Kim HJ, Kang KT, Park SC, Kwon OH, Son J, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS, Lenke LG.

Spine J. 2017 May;17(5):671-680. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

PMID:
27867080
17.

Analysis of biomechanical changes after removal of instrumentation in lumbar arthrodesis by finite element analysis.

Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Moon SH, Kang KT, Kim HS, Park JO, Moon ES, Sohn JS, Lee HM.

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010 Jul;48(7):703-9. doi: 10.1007/s11517-010-0621-2. Epub 2010 May 4.

PMID:
20440570
18.

The biomechanical influence of the facet joint orientation and the facet tropism in the lumbar spine.

Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Lee HM, Kang KT, Lee CK, Chang BS, Yeom JS.

Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Sep 12. Erratum in: Spine J. 2014 Mar 1;14(3):A8.

PMID:
24035730
19.

An anatomical study of the mid-lateral pars relative to the pedicle footprint in the lower lumbar spine.

Su BW, Kim PD, Cha TD, Lee J, April EW, Weidenbaum M, Vaccaro AR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1355-62. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4f3a9.

PMID:
19478655
20.

Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.

Liu CL, Zhong ZC, Shih SL, Hung C, Lee YE, Chen CS.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Aug;23(6):410-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b63d89.

PMID:
20683426

Supplemental Content

Support Center