Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Effect of patient arm motion in whole-body PET/CT.

Lodge MA, Mhlanga JC, Cho SY, Wahl RL.

J Nucl Med. 2011 Dec;52(12):1891-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.093583. Epub 2011 Nov 11.

2.

Evaluation of scatter limitation correction: a new method of correcting photopenic artifacts caused by patient motion during whole-body PET/CT imaging.

Miwa K, Umeda T, Murata T, Wagatsuma K, Miyaji N, Terauchi T, Koizumi M, Sasaki M.

Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Feb;37(2):147-54. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000403.

PMID:
26440565
3.

Patient motion effects on the quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with dynamic PET imaging.

Hunter CR, Klein R, Beanlands RS, deKemp RA.

Med Phys. 2016 Apr;43(4):1829. doi: 10.1118/1.4943565.

PMID:
27036580
4.

Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts.

Beyer T, Bockisch A, Kühl H, Martinez MJ.

J Nucl Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):91-9.

5.

Implementation and performance evaluation of simultaneous PET/MR whole-body imaging with continuous table motion.

Braun H, Ziegler S, Lentschig MG, Quick HH.

J Nucl Med. 2014 Jan;55(1):161-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123372. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

6.

The effect of MR surface coils on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR: results from a pseudo-PET/MR phantom study.

Tellmann L, Quick HH, Bockisch A, Herzog H, Beyer T.

Med Phys. 2011 May;38(5):2795-805.

PMID:
21776816
7.

Scatter Correction with Combined Single-Scatter Simulation and Monte Carlo Simulation Scaling Improved the Visual Artifacts and Quantification in 3-Dimensional Brain PET/CT Imaging with 15O-Gas Inhalation.

Magota K, Shiga T, Asano Y, Shinyama D, Ye J, Perkins AE, Maniawski PJ, Toyonaga T, Kobayashi K, Hirata K, Katoh C, Hattori N, Tamaki N.

J Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;58(12):2020-2025. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193060. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

PMID:
28646012
8.

Improvement of attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET/MR imaging with a positron-emitting source.

Mollet P, Keereman V, Bini J, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Fayad ZA, Vandenberghe S.

J Nucl Med. 2014 Feb;55(2):329-36. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.125989. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

9.

Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.

Mehranian A, Zaidi H.

J Nucl Med. 2015 Apr;56(4):635-41. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.148817. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

10.

Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone.

Andersen FL, Ladefoged CN, Beyer T, Keller SH, Hansen AE, Højgaard L, Kjær A, Law I, Holm S.

Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.042. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

11.

Effect of motion on tracer activity determination in CT attenuation corrected PET images: a lung phantom study.

Pevsner A, Nehmeh SA, Humm JL, Mageras GS, Erdi YE.

Med Phys. 2005 Jul;32(7):2358-62.

PMID:
16121593
12.

Cine CT for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT.

Alessio AM, Kohlmyer S, Branch K, Chen G, Caldwell J, Kinahan P.

J Nucl Med. 2007 May;48(5):794-801.

13.

X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Kinahan PE, Hasegawa BH, Beyer T.

Semin Nucl Med. 2003 Jul;33(3):166-79. Review.

PMID:
12931319
14.

Systematic Comparison of the Performance of Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Imaging to Conventional PET/CT for ¹⁸F-FDG Brain Imaging in Patients Examined for Suspected Dementia.

Hitz S, Habekost C, Fürst S, Delso G, Förster S, Ziegler S, Nekolla SG, Souvatzoglou M, Beer AJ, Grimmer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Drzezga A.

J Nucl Med. 2014 Jun;55(6):923-31. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.126813. Epub 2014 May 15.

15.

[Impact of the standardized uptake value on the body trunk with truncation error of μ-map in the positron emission tomography/computed tomography: phantom studies].

Kangai Y, Onishi H, Sanai H, Mimura H, Yanagimoto S.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2013 Feb;69(2):178-83. Japanese.

16.

PET motion compensation for radiation therapy using a CT-based mid-position motion model: methodology and clinical evaluation.

Kruis MF, van de Kamer JB, Houweling AC, Sonke JJ, Belderbos JS, van Herk M.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Oct 1;87(2):394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

PMID:
23910710
17.

Description and assessment of a registration-based approach to include bones for attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MRI.

Marshall HR, Patrick J, Laidley D, Prato FS, Butler J, Théberge J, Thompson RT, Stodilka RZ.

Med Phys. 2013 Aug;40(8):082509. doi: 10.1118/1.4816301.

PMID:
23927354
18.

On the quantification accuracy, homogeneity, and stability of simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging systems.

Schmidt H, Schwenzer NF, Bezrukov I, Mantlik F, Kolb A, Kupferschläger J, Pichler BJ.

Invest Radiol. 2014 Jun;49(6):373-81. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000021.

PMID:
24368614
19.

A virtual sinogram method to reduce dental metallic implant artefacts in computed tomography-based attenuation correction for PET.

Abdoli M, Ay MR, Ahmadian A, Zaidi H.

Nucl Med Commun. 2010 Jan;31(1):22-31. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32832fa241.

PMID:
19829166
20.

Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.

Bettinardi V, Mancosu P, Danna M, Giovacchini G, Landoni C, Picchio M, Gilardi MC, Savi A, Castiglioni I, Lecchi M, Fazio F.

Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Sep;51(3):214-23. Epub 2007 Apr 30.

PMID:
17464266

Supplemental Content

Support Center