Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 89

1.

Development of a new Knee Society scoring system.

Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, Sikorskii A, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Chadha P, Daylamani DA, Scott WN, Bourne RB.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):20-32. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2152-z.

2.

A new high-flexion knee scoring system to eliminate the ceiling effect.

Na SE, Ha CW, Lee CH.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):584-93. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2203-5. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

3.

The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System.

Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):3-19. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2135-0. No abstract available.

4.

The Knee Society Short Form Reduces Respondent Burden in the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcomes.

Scuderi GR, Sikorskii A, Bourne RB, Lonner JH, Benjamin JB, Noble PC.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):134-42. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4370-2.

5.

Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.

Kim SJ, Basur MS, Park CK, Chong S, Kang YG, Kim MJ, Jeong JS, Kim TK.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

PMID:
28265885
6.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Japanese version of the new Knee Society Scoring System for osteoarthritic knee with total knee arthroplasty.

Hamamoto Y, Ito H, Furu M, Ishikawa M, Azukizawa M, Kuriyama S, Nakamura S, Matsuda S.

J Orthop Sci. 2015 Sep;20(5):849-53. doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0736-2. Epub 2015 May 16.

PMID:
25982223
7.

Subjective evaluation before and after total knee arthroplasty using the 2011 Knee Society Score.

Kuroda Y, Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M.

Knee. 2016 Dec;23(6):964-967. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

PMID:
27802922
8.

High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty.

Parvizi J, Nunley RM, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Ruh EL, Clohisy JC, Hamilton WG, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):133-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3229-7.

9.

Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.

Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB; Kinemax Outcomes Group.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Dec;83-A(12):1856-64.

PMID:
11741066
10.

A New Prediction Model for Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Van Onsem S, Van Der Straeten C, Arnout N, Deprez P, Van Damme G, Victor J.

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2660-2667.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jul 14.

PMID:
27506723
11.

French adaptation of the new Knee Society Scoring System for total knee arthroplasty.

Debette C, Parratte S, Maucort-Boulch D, Blanc G, Pauly V, Lustig S, Servien E, Neyret P, Argenson JN.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Sep;100(5):531-4. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.025. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

12.

Limitations of the Knee Society Score in evaluating outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Ghanem E, Pawasarat I, Lindsay A, May L, Azzam K, Joshi A, Parvizi J.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Oct 20;92(14):2445-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00252.

PMID:
20962195
13.

Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?

Lyons MC, MacDonald SJ, Somerville LE, Naudie DD, McCalden RW.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2144-z.

14.

Total knee arthroplasty in motivated patients with knee osteoarthritis and athletic activity approach type goals: a conceptual decision-making model.

Nyland J, Kanouse Z, Krupp R, Caborn D, Jakob R.

Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(17-18):1683-92. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.533816. Epub 2010 Nov 26.

PMID:
21110726
15.

Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments.

Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP.

J Arthroplasty. 2001 Sep;16(6):740-7.

PMID:
11547372
16.

Influence of gender on age of treatment with TKA and functional outcome.

Parsley BS, Bertolusso R, Harrington M, Brekke A, Noble PC.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jul;468(7):1759-64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1348-y.

17.

Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Rampersaud YR, Ravi B, Lewis SJ, Stas V, Barron R, Davey R, Mahomed N.

Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):296-304. Epub 2007 Jun 18.

PMID:
17669690
18.

Correlations between patient satisfaction and ability to perform daily activities after total knee arthroplasty: why aren't patients satisfied?

Nakahara H, Okazaki K, Mizu-Uchi H, Hamai S, Tashiro Y, Matsuda S, Iwamoto Y.

J Orthop Sci. 2015 Jan;20(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0671-7. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

PMID:
25366699
19.
20.

Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late aquatic therapy after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Liebs TR, Herzberg W, RĂ¼ther W, Haasters J, Russlies M, Hassenpflug J; Multicenter Arthroplasty Aftercare Project.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Feb;93(2):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

PMID:
22196125

Supplemental Content

Support Center