Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 168

1.

Different motion cues are used to estimate time-to-arrival for frontoparallel and looming trajectories.

Calabro FJ, Beardsley SA, Vaina LM.

Vision Res. 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

2.

Evaluating methods to measure time-to-contact.

Lugtigheid AJ, Welchman AE.

Vision Res. 2011 Oct 15;51(20):2234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.019. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

3.

How we perceive the trajectory of an approaching object.

Duke PA, Rushton SK.

J Vis. 2012 Mar 8;12(3):9. doi: 10.1167/12.3.9.

PMID:
22408040
4.

Differential contribution of velocity and distance to time estimation during self-initiated time-to-collision judgment.

Li Y, Mo L, Chen Q.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;73:35-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 Apr 28.

PMID:
25934633
5.

Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Baurès R, Bennett SJ, Causer J.

Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jan;233(1):253-61. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4110-y. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

PMID:
25266716
6.

Time-to-passage judgments on circular trajectories are based on relative optical acceleration.

Kerzel D, Hecht H, Kim NG.

Percept Psychophys. 2001 Oct;63(7):1153-70.

PMID:
11766941
7.

Visual processing of the impending collision of a looming object: time to collision revisited.

Yan JJ, Lorv B, Li H, Sun HJ.

J Vis. 2011 Oct 14;11(12). pii: 7. doi: 10.1167/11.12.7.

PMID:
22003252
8.

Judging the contact-times of multiple objects: Evidence for asymmetric interference.

Baurès R, Oberfeld D, Hecht H.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Apr 27.

PMID:
20423735
9.

Effects of task-irrelevant texture motion on time-to-contact judgments.

Oberfeld D, Hecht H, Landwehr K.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):581-96. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0040-3.

PMID:
21264724
10.

Multiple sources of information and time-to-contact judgments.

Kim NG, Grocki MJ.

Vision Res. 2006 Jun;46(12):1946-58. Epub 2006 Feb 15.

11.

Observers cannot accurately estimate the speed of an approaching object in flight.

Rushton SK, Duke PA.

Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(15):1919-28. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.012. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

12.

Discriminating direction of motion trajectories from angular speed and background information.

Bian Z, Braunstein ML, Andersen GJ.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Oct;75(7):1570-82. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0488-z.

13.

Judging time-to-passage of looming sounds: Evidence for the use of distance-based information.

Silva RM, Lamas J, Silva CC, Coello Y, Mouta S, Santos JA.

PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0177734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177734. eCollection 2017.

14.
15.

Quantifying human sensitivity to spatio-temporal information in dynamic faces.

Dobs K, Bülthoff I, Breidt M, Vuong QC, Curio C, Schultz J.

Vision Res. 2014 Jul;100:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

16.

A looming-sensitive pathway responds to changes in the trajectory of object motion.

McMillan GA, Gray JR.

J Neurophysiol. 2012 Aug;108(4):1052-68. doi: 10.1152/jn.00847.2011. Epub 2012 May 9.

17.

Collision judgment of objects approaching the head.

Poljac E, Neggers B, van den Berg AV.

Exp Brain Res. 2006 May;171(1):35-46. Epub 2005 Dec 3.

PMID:
16328256
18.

Global flow impacts time-to-passage judgments based on local motion cues.

Beardsley SA, Sikoglu EM, Hecht H, Vaina LM.

Vision Res. 2011 Aug 15;51(16):1880-7. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

19.

Conflicting motion information impairs multiple object tracking.

St Clair R, Huff M, Seiffert AE.

J Vis. 2010 Apr 28;10(4):18.1-13. doi: 10.1167/10.4.18.

PMID:
20465337
20.

Temporal-range estimation of multiple objects: evidence for an early bottleneck.

Baurès R, Oberfeld D, Hecht H.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 May;137(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Mar 26.

PMID:
21440884

Supplemental Content

Support Center