Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 60

1.

The growth of clinical trials and systematic reviews in informing dermatological patient care.

Williams HC, Dellavalle RP.

J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Mar;132(3 Pt 2):1008-17. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.337. Epub 2011 Nov 3. Review.

3.

Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).

Brettschneider C, Lühmann D, Raspe H.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092.

4.

The use of systematic reviews in clinical trials and narrative reviews in dermatology: is the best evidence being used?

Conde-Taboada A, Aranegui B, García-Doval I, Dávila-Seijo P, González-Castro U.

Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014 Apr;105(3):295-9. doi: 10.1016/j.adengl.2013.10.007. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

PMID:
24661956
5.

The effectiveness of interventions in workplace health promotion as to maintain the working capacity of health care personal.

Buchberger B, Heymann R, Huppertz H, Friepörtner K, Pomorin N, Wasem J.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011;7:Doc06. doi: 10.3205/hta000097. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

6.
7.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

8.

Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials.

Scott I, Greenberg P, Poole P, Campbell D.

Intern Med J. 2006 Sep;36(9):587-99.

PMID:
16911551
9.

Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.

Strech D, Soltmann B, Weikert B, Bauer M, Pfennig A.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;72(9):1214-21. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06166yel. Epub 2011 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
21294992
10.

Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review.

Meher S, Alfirevic Z.

BJOG. 2014 Sep;121(10):1188-94; discussion 1195-6. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12593. Epub 2014 Feb 27. Review.

11.
12.

Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Cheng JS, Lee MJ, Massicotte E, Ashman B, Gruenberg M, Pilcher LE, Skelly AC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S144-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef5b4. Review.

PMID:
21952186
13.

Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation.

Gianola S, Gasparini M, Agostini M, Castellini G, Corbetta D, Gozzer P, Li LC, Sirtori V, Taricco M, Tetzlaff JM, Turolla A, Moher D, Moja L.

Phys Ther. 2013 Nov;93(11):1456-66. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120382. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

PMID:
23744458
14.

Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?

Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I.

PLoS Med. 2010 Sep 21;7(9):e1000326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326.

15.

How prominent are patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of dermatological treatments?

Townshend AP, Chen CM, Williams HC.

Br J Dermatol. 2008 Nov;159(5):1152-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08799.x. Epub 2008 Aug 20. Review.

PMID:
18721190
16.

Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias.

Brito JP, Tsapas A, Griebeler ML, Wang Z, Prutsky GJ, Domecq JP, Murad MH, Montori VM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;66(6):633-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 16. Review.

PMID:
23510557
17.

The contribution of systematic reviews to the practice of pediatric nephrology.

Hodson E, Craig JC.

Pediatr Nephrol. 2013 Feb;28(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2155-3. Epub 2012 Apr 4. Review.

PMID:
22476252
18.

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.

Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM.

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(2):91-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

PMID:
21145753
19.

Prevention of alcohol misuse among children, youths and young adults.

Korczak D, Steinhauser G, Dietl M.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011;7:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/hta000095. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

20.

Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility.

Farquhar C, Moore V, Bhattacharya S, Blake D, Vail A, Thomas J, Cheong Y, Showell M, Nagels H, Marjoribanks J; Cochrane Editorial Board of the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group..

Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):2883-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det334. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

PMID:
23990642

Supplemental Content

Support Center