Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 335

1.

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.

Chou CY, Jordan CA, McGhee CN, Patel DV.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;153(3):412-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

PMID:
22000702
2.

The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.

Park SJ, Ang GS, Nicholas S, Wells AP.

Ophthalmology. 2012 Mar;119(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.058. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

PMID:
22035576
3.

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.

Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.003.

PMID:
18222191
4.

Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.

Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P.

Eye (Lond). 2011 May;25(5):642-50. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.60. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

5.

Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.

Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF.

Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

PMID:
20122737
6.

Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN.

Eye (Lond). 2006 Feb;20(2):191-8.

PMID:
15803173
7.

Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.

Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, Füllhas MO, Wiegand W.

J Glaucoma. 2008 Aug;17(5):361-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c3ad3. Erratum in: J Glaucoma. 2008 Oct-Nov;17(7):604. Annette, Hager [corrected to Hager, Annette]; Kristina, Loge [corrected to Loge, Kristina]; Bernd, Schroeder [corrected to Schroeder, Bernd]; Mark-Oliver, Füllhas [corrected to Füllhas, Mark-Oliver]; Wolfgang, Wiegand [corrected to Wiegand, Wolfgang].

PMID:
18703945
8.

Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.

Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Dec;47(12):5337-47.

PMID:
17122122
9.

Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.

Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, Quigley HA.

J Glaucoma. 2007 Oct-Nov;16(7):581-8.

PMID:
18091174
10.

Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.

Hagishima M, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, Morita T, Shoji N, Shimizu K.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb;248(2):257-62. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1202-7. Epub 2009 Sep 29.

PMID:
19787365
11.

Comparison of the ocular response analyzer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Feizi S, Hashemloo A, Rastegarpour A.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 29;52(8):5887-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6771.

PMID:
21447674
12.

Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.

Papastergiou GI, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS.

J Glaucoma. 2008 Sep;17(6):484-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181622502.

PMID:
18794685
13.

Intraocular pressure measurements and biomechanical properties of the cornea in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty.

Fabian ID, Barequet IS, Skaat A, Rechtman E, Goldenfeld M, Roberts CJ, Melamed S.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 May;151(5):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.007. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

PMID:
21310386
14.

Tonometry in keratoconic eyes before and after riboflavin/UVA corneal collagen crosslinking using three different tonometers.

Gkika MG, Labiris G, Kozobolis VP.

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):142-52. doi: 10.5301/EJO.2011.8328.

PMID:
21574162
15.

Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK.

Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C.

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Apr;30(4):746-51.

PMID:
15093634
16.

Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.

Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Nessim M, Laiquzzaman M, Sivakumar S, Hartley S, Shah S.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;92(12):1661-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.136473. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

PMID:
18757471
17.

Effect of recipient corneal pathology on Pascal tonometer and Goldmann tonometer readings in eyes after penetrating keratoplasty.

Papastergiou GI, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS.

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan-Feb;20(1):29-34.

PMID:
19876890
18.

Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry.

Oncel B, Dinc U, Orge F, Yalvac B.

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov-Dec;19(6):936-41.

PMID:
19882585
19.

Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.

Morita T, Shoji N, Kamiya K, Hagishima M, Fujimura F, Shimizu K.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;248(1):73-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1169-4. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

PMID:
19693527
20.

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.

Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3118-21.

PMID:
15326129

Supplemental Content

Support Center