Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 116

1.

[Critical reading of clinical trials].

Aptel F, Cucherat M, Blumen-Ohana E, Denis P.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011 Dec;34(10):755-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Oct 11. Review. French.

2.

Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.

Conn HO.

J Intern Med. 1997 Mar;241(3):177-83. Review.

3.

Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).

Brettschneider C, Lühmann D, Raspe H.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092.

4.

[The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].

Labenz J, Kunz CU.

Anaesthesist. 2011 Jan;60(1):79-89; quiz 90. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1840-5. Review. German.

PMID:
21264653
5.
6.

[Meta-analysis of therapeutic trials: applications in psychiatry].

Cucherat M, Cialdella P.

Encephale. 1996 Sep-Oct;22(5):378-87. French.

PMID:
9035995
7.
8.

Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.

Hansen JB, Juhl CB, Boutron I, Tugwell P, Ghogomu EA, Pardo Pardo J, Rader T, Wells GA, Mayhew A, Maxwell L, Lund H, Christensen R; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.

BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 3;4(10):e005491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005491.

9.

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.

10.

Practical and updated guidelines on performing meta-analyses of non-randomized studies in interventional cardiology.

Navarese EP, Koziński M, Pafundi T, Andreotti F, Buffon A, Servi SD, Kubica J.

Cardiol J. 2011;18(1):3-7. Review.

11.

Clinical trial quality needs to be improved to facilitate metaanalyses.

Chalmers TC.

Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1993 Sep 11;Doc No 89:[1541 words; 14 paragraphs]. No abstract available.

PMID:
8306015
12.

[The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].

Labenz J, Kunz CU.

Internist (Berl). 2010 Apr;51(4):489-99; quiz 500. doi: 10.1007/s00108-010-2581-x. German.

PMID:
20221576
13.

Meta-analysis of a continuous outcome combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a method based on simulated individual patient data.

Yamaguchi Y, Sakamoto W, Goto M, Staessen JA, Wang J, Gueyffier F, Riley RD.

Res Synth Methods. 2014 Dec;5(4):322-51. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1119. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

PMID:
26052956
14.

Pharmacology and statistics: recommendations to strengthen a productive partnership.

Spector R, Vesell ES.

Pharmacology. 2006;78(3):113-22. Epub 2006 Sep 27.

15.

Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.

Christensen E.

J Hepatol. 2007 May;46(5):947-54. Epub 2007 Mar 9. Review.

PMID:
17412447
16.

How to read a nephrology systematic review.

Palmer SC, Navaneethan SD, Strippoli GF.

Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Mar;15(2):158-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01284.x.

PMID:
20470273
17.
18.

Bone graft substitutes for the treatment of traumatic fractures of the extremities.

Hagen A, Gorenoi V, Schönermark MP.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2012;8:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/hta000102. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

19.

[Reading research articles].

van der Graaf Y, Zaat J.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A9004. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
26058770
20.

Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.

Savović J, Jones H, Altman D, Harris R, Jűni P, Pildal J, Als-Nielsen B, Balk E, Gluud C, Gluud L, Ioannidis J, Schulz K, Beynon R, Welton N, Wood L, Moher D, Deeks J, Sterne J.

Health Technol Assess. 2012 Sep;16(35):1-82. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center