Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 280

1.

In vivo role for the chromatin-remodeling enzyme SWI/SNF in the removal of promoter nucleosomes by disassembly rather than sliding.

Brown CR, Mao C, Falkovskaia E, Law JK, Boeger H.

J Biol Chem. 2011 Nov 25;286(47):40556-65. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.289918. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

2.

Removal of promoter nucleosomes by disassembly rather than sliding in vivo.

Boeger H, Griesenbeck J, Strattan JS, Kornberg RD.

Mol Cell. 2004 Jun 4;14(5):667-73.

4.

In vitro reconstitution of PHO5 promoter chromatin remodeling points to a role for activator-nucleosome competition in vivo.

Ertel F, Dirac-Svejstrup AB, Hertel CB, Blaschke D, Svejstrup JQ, Korber P.

Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Aug;30(16):4060-76. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01399-09. Epub 2010 Jun 21.

5.

Chromatin disassembly from the PHO5 promoter is essential for the recruitment of the general transcription machinery and coactivators.

Adkins MW, Williams SK, Linger J, Tyler JK.

Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Sep;27(18):6372-82. Epub 2007 Jul 9.

6.

The RSC chromatin remodeling complex has a crucial role in the complete remodeler set for yeast PHO5 promoter opening.

Musladin S, Krietenstein N, Korber P, Barbaric S.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Apr;42(7):4270-82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1395. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

7.

The histone chaperone Asf1 increases the rate of histone eviction at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters.

Korber P, Barbaric S, Luckenbach T, Schmid A, Schermer UJ, Blaschke D, Hörz W.

J Biol Chem. 2006 Mar 3;281(9):5539-45. Epub 2006 Jan 4.

8.

Mediator, TATA-binding protein, and RNA polymerase II contribute to low histone occupancy at active gene promoters in yeast.

Ansari SA, Paul E, Sommer S, Lieleg C, He Q, Daly AZ, Rode KA, Barber WT, Ellis LC, LaPorta E, Orzechowski AM, Taylor E, Reeb T, Wong J, Korber P, Morse RH.

J Biol Chem. 2014 May 23;289(21):14981-95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.529354. Epub 2014 Apr 11. Erratum in: J Biol Chem. 2016 May 6;291(19):9938.

9.

Activator control of nucleosome occupancy in activation and repression of transcription.

Bryant GO, Prabhu V, Floer M, Wang X, Spagna D, Schreiber D, Ptashne M.

PLoS Biol. 2008 Dec 23;6(12):2928-39. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060317.

10.

A novel mechanism of antagonism between ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes regulates RNR3 expression.

Tomar RS, Psathas JN, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Reese JC.

Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Jun;29(12):3255-65. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01741-08. Epub 2009 Apr 6.

11.

Active PHO5 chromatin encompasses variable numbers of nucleosomes at individual promoters.

Jessen WJ, Hoose SA, Kilgore JA, Kladde MP.

Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Mar;13(3):256-63. Epub 2006 Feb 19.

PMID:
16491089
12.

Nucleosome retention and the stochastic nature of promoter chromatin remodeling for transcription.

Boeger H, Griesenbeck J, Kornberg RD.

Cell. 2008 May 16;133(4):716-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.051.

13.
14.
15.

The yeast PHO5 promoter: from single locus to systems biology of a paradigm for gene regulation through chromatin.

Korber P, Barbaric S.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(17):10888-902. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku784. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Review.

16.

Chromatin remodelers clear nucleosomes from intrinsically unfavorable sites to establish nucleosome-depleted regions at promoters.

Tolkunov D, Zawadzki KA, Singer C, Elfving N, Morozov AV, Broach JR.

Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Jun 15;22(12):2106-18. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-10-0826. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

17.

The ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzyme Fun30 represses transcription by sliding promoter-proximal nucleosomes.

Byeon B, Wang W, Barski A, Ranallo RT, Bao K, Schones DE, Zhao K, Wu C, Wu WH.

J Biol Chem. 2013 Aug 9;288(32):23182-93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.471979. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

18.

Promoter occupancy is a major determinant of chromatin remodeling enzyme requirements.

Dhasarathy A, Kladde MP.

Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Apr;25(7):2698-707. Erratum in: Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Jan;26(1):388.

19.

Differential cofactor requirements for histone eviction from two nucleosomes at the yeast PHO84 promoter are determined by intrinsic nucleosome stability.

Wippo CJ, Krstulovic BS, Ertel F, Musladin S, Blaschke D, Stürzl S, Yuan GC, Hörz W, Korber P, Barbaric S.

Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Jun;29(11):2960-81. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01054-08. Epub 2009 Mar 23.

20.

Transcriptional regulation of the yeast PHO8 promoter in comparison to the coregulated PHO5 promoter.

Munsterkötter M, Barbaric S, Hörz W.

J Biol Chem. 2000 Jul 28;275(30):22678-85.

Supplemental Content

Support Center