Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 92

1.

Fate and removal of permethrin by conventional activated sludge treatment.

Santos A, Reif R, Hillis P, Judd SJ.

Environ Technol. 2011 Aug-Sep;32(11-12):1367-73.

PMID:
21970178
2.

Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.

Bal AS, Dhagat NN.

Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Review.

PMID:
12397675
3.

Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.

Radjenović J, Petrović M, Barceló D.

Water Res. 2009 Feb;43(3):831-41. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.043. Epub 2008 Dec 7.

PMID:
19091371
4.

Effect of bio-sludge concentration on the efficiency of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system to treat wastewater containing Pb2+ and Ni2+.

Sirianuntapiboon S, Boonchupleing M.

J Hazard Mater. 2009 Jul 15;166(1):356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.023. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

PMID:
19097695
5.

Removal of quinolone antibiotics from wastewaters by sorption and biological degradation in laboratory-scale membrane bioreactors.

Dorival-García N, Zafra-Gómez A, Navalón A, González J, Vílchez JL.

Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 1;442:317-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

PMID:
23178836
6.

Assessing potential modifications to the activated sludge process to improve simultaneous removal of a diverse range of micropollutants.

Petrie B, McAdam EJ, Lester JN, Cartmell E.

Water Res. 2014 Oct 1;62:180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.036. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

7.

Fate and behaviour of copper and zinc in secondary biological wastewater treatment processes: II. Removal at varying sludge age.

Santos A, Barton P, Cartmell E, Coulon F, Crane RS, Hillis P, Lester JN, Stephenson T, Judd SJ.

Environ Technol. 2010 Jun;31(7):725-43. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2010.481315.

PMID:
20586235
8.

Performance of aerobic granular sludge in different bioreactors.

Zhao X, Chen Z, Shen J, Wang X.

Environ Technol. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(5-8):938-44.

PMID:
24645477
9.

Mass balance of nitrogen, and estimates of COD, nitrogen and phosphorus used in microbial synthesis as a function of sludge retention time in a sequencing batch reactor system.

Lee JK, Choi CK, Lee KH, Yim SB.

Bioresour Technol. 2008 Nov;99(16):7788-96. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.057. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

PMID:
18325762
10.

Dynamic modelling of solids in a full-scale activated sludge plant preceded by CEPT as a preliminary step for micropollutant removal modelling.

Baalbaki Z, Torfs E, Maere T, Yargeau V, Vanrolleghem PA.

Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2017 Apr;40(4):499-510. doi: 10.1007/s00449-016-1715-5. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

PMID:
28013379
11.
12.

Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.

Sahar E, Ernst M, Godehardt M, Hein A, Herr J, Kazner C, Melin T, Cikurel H, Aharoni A, Messalem R, Brenner A, Jekel M.

Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(4):733-40. doi: 10.2166/wst.2011.300.

PMID:
21330721
13.

The pharmaceutical use of permethrin: sources and behavior during municipal sewage treatment.

Turner T, Cartmell E, Lester JN, Casse F, Comber SD, Scrimshaw MD.

Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011 Aug;61(2):193-201. doi: 10.1007/s00244-010-9615-1. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

PMID:
21069313
14.

Oxidative and photochemical processes for the removal of galaxolide and tonalide from wastewater.

Santiago-Morales J, Gómez MJ, Herrera S, Fernández-Alba AR, García-Calvo E, Rosal R.

Water Res. 2012 Sep 15;46(14):4435-47. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.051. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

PMID:
22709983
15.

Treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater: ozone or powdered activated carbon?

Margot J, Kienle C, Magnet A, Weil M, Rossi L, de Alencastro LF, Abegglen C, Thonney D, Chèvre N, Schärer M, Barry DA.

Sci Total Environ. 2013 Sep 1;461-462:480-98. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.034. Epub 2013 Jun 8.

PMID:
23751332
16.

Removal of antibiotics in wastewater: Effect of hydraulic and solid retention times on the fate of tetracycline in the activated sludge process.

Kim S, Eichhorn P, Jensen JN, Weber AS, Aga DS.

Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Aug 1;39(15):5816-23.

PMID:
16124320
17.

Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant.

Clara M, Strenn B, Ausserleitner M, Kreuzinger N.

Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(5):29-36.

PMID:
15497826
18.

Comparison between hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor and activated sludge system: a pilot plant experiment.

Di Trapani D, Mannina G, Torregrossa M, Viviani G.

Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(4):891-902. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.834.

PMID:
20182067
19.

Parameters affecting the occurrence and removal of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in twenty Canadian wastewater treatment plants.

Kim M, Guerra P, Theocharides M, Barclay K, Smyth SA, Alaee M.

Water Res. 2013 May 1;47(7):2213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.031. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

PMID:
23466032
20.

Treatment of wastewater containing phenol using a tubular ceramic membrane bioreactor.

Ersu CB, Ong SK.

Environ Technol. 2008 Feb;29(2):225-34. doi: 10.1080/09593330802029012.

PMID:
18613621

Supplemental Content

Support Center