Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 199


Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.

Lucassen W, Geersing GJ, Erkens PM, Reitsma JB, Moons KG, Büller H, van Weert HC.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):448-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007. Review.


Qualitative point-of-care D-dimer testing compared with quantitative D-dimer testing in excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care.

Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Geersing GJ, Büller HR, Moons KG, Stoffers HE, van Weert HC.

J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13(6):1004-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.12951. Epub 2015 May 9.


Excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care using the Wells-rule in combination with a point-of care D-dimer test: a scenario analysis.

Lucassen WA, Douma RA, Toll DB, Büller HR, van Weert HC.

BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Sep 13;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-64.


Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.

Hendriksen JM, Lucassen WA, Erkens PM, Stoffers HE, van Weert HC, Büller HR, Hoes AW, Moons KG, Geersing GJ.

Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):227-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.1930.


Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.

Douma RA, Mos IC, Erkens PM, Nizet TA, Durian MF, Hovens MM, van Houten AA, Hofstee HM, Klok FA, ten Cate H, Ullmann EF, Büller HR, Kamphuisen PW, Huisman MV; Prometheus Study Group.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):709-18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00002.


The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

van Es N, Kraaijpoel N, Klok FA, Huisman MV, Den Exter PL, Mos IC, Galipienzo J, Büller HR, Bossuyt PM.

J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr;15(4):678-684. doi: 10.1111/jth.13630. Epub 2017 Feb 16.


Clinical decision rule and D-dimer have lower clinical utility to exclude pulmonary embolism in cancer patients. Explanations and potential ameliorations.

Douma RA, van Sluis GL, Kamphuisen PW, Söhne M, Leebeek FW, Bossuyt PM, Büller HR.

Thromb Haemost. 2010 Oct;104(4):831-6. doi: 10.1160/TH10-02-0093. Epub 2010 Jul 20.


Screening for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected DVT or PE by the sequential use of clinical score: a sensitive quantitative D-dimer test and noninvasive diagnostic tools.

Michiels JJ, Gadisseur A, van der Planken M, Schroyens W, De Maeseneer M, Hermsen JT, Trienekens PH, Hoogsteden H, Pattynama PM.

Semin Vasc Med. 2005 Nov;5(4):351-64. Review.


Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Michiels JJ, Gadisseur A, van der Planken M, Schroyens W, De Maeseneer M, Hermsen JT, Trienekens PH, Hoogsteden H, Pattynama PM.

Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006 Oct;32(7):678-93. Review.


VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.

Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, Rodger M, Wuillemin WA, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92. Review.


Accuracy of the Wells clinical prediction rule for pulmonary embolism in older ambulatory adults.

Schouten HJ, Geersing GJ, Oudega R, van Delden JJ, Moons KG, Koek HL.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Nov;62(11):2136-41. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13080. Epub 2014 Nov 3.


[Exclusion of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism using clinical decision rules and D-dimer tests].

Mos IC, Tan M, Klok FA, Kamphuisen PW, Huisman MV.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A2054. Review. Dutch.


A simple decision rule including D-dimer to reduce the need for computed tomography scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

van Es J, Beenen LF, Douma RA, den Exter PL, Mos IC, Kaasjager HA, Huisman MV, Kamphuisen PW, Middeldorp S, Bossuyt PM.

J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Aug;13(8):1428-35. doi: 10.1111/jth.13011. Epub 2015 Jun 19.


Wells Rule and d-Dimer Testing to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis.

van Es N, van der Hulle T, van Es J, den Exter PL, Douma RA, Goekoop RJ, Mos IC, Galipienzo J, Kamphuisen PW, Huisman MV, Klok FA, Büller HR, Bossuyt PM.

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 16;165(4):253-61. doi: 10.7326/M16-0031. Epub 2016 May 17. Review.


Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Kruisman E, Spaan J, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;6(1):40-4. Epub 2007 Oct 29.


The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.

van Es J, Mos I, Douma R, Erkens P, Durian M, Nizet T, van Houten A, Hofstee H, ten Cate H, Ullmann E, Büller H, Huisman M, Kamphuisen PW.

Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jan;107(1):167-71. doi: 10.1160/TH11-08-0587. Epub 2011 Nov 10.


Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study.

Geersing GJ, Erkens PM, Lucassen WA, Büller HR, Cate HT, Hoes AW, Moons KG, Prins MH, Oudega R, van Weert HC, Stoffers HE.

BMJ. 2012 Oct 4;345:e6564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6564.


Performance of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (the PERC rule) combined with low clinical probability in high prevalence population.

Penaloza A, Verschuren F, Dambrine S, Zech F, Thys F, Roy PM.

Thromb Res. 2012 May;129(5):e189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.016. Epub 2012 Mar 15.


Supplemental Content

Support Center