Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 80

1.

How yeast re-programmes its transcriptional profile in response to different nutrient impulses.

Dikicioglu D, Karabekmez E, Rash B, Pir P, Kirdar B, Oliver SG.

BMC Syst Biol. 2011 Sep 25;5:148. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-148.

2.

Short- and long-term dynamic responses of the metabolic network and gene expression in yeast to a transient change in the nutrient environment.

Dikicioglu D, Dunn WB, Kell DB, Kirdar B, Oliver SG.

Mol Biosyst. 2012 Jun;8(6):1760-74. doi: 10.1039/c2mb05443d.

PMID:
22491778
3.

A novel strategy for selection and validation of reference genes in dynamic multidimensional experimental design in yeast.

Cankorur-Cetinkaya A, Dereli E, Eraslan S, Karabekmez E, Dikicioglu D, Kirdar B.

PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038351.

4.

Metabolic and transcriptomic response of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain EC1118 after an oxygen impulse under carbon-sufficient, nitrogen-limited fermentative conditions.

Orellana M, Aceituno FF, Slater AW, Almonacid LI, Melo F, Agosin E.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2014 May;14(3):412-24. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12135.

5.

Glucose- and nitrogen sensing and regulatory mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Rødkaer SV, Faergeman NJ.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2014 Aug;14(5):683-96. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12157. Review.

6.

Dynamic responses of reserve carbohydrate metabolism under carbon and nitrogen limitations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Parrou JL, Enjalbert B, Plourde L, Bauche A, Gonzalez B, François J.

Yeast. 1999 Feb;15(3):191-203.

7.

Growth-limiting intracellular metabolites in yeast growing under diverse nutrient limitations.

Boer VM, Crutchfield CA, Bradley PH, Botstein D, Rabinowitz JD.

Mol Biol Cell. 2010 Jan 1;21(1):198-211. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-07-0597.

8.

Global transcriptional and physiological responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ammonium, L-alanine, or L-glutamine limitation.

Usaite R, Patil KR, Grotkjaer T, Nielsen J, Regenberg B.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):6194-203.

9.
10.

A system based network approach to ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Kasavi C, Eraslan S, Arga KY, Oner ET, Kirdar B.

BMC Syst Biol. 2014 Aug 8;8:90. doi: 10.1186/s12918-014-0090-6.

11.

When transcriptome meets metabolome: fast cellular responses of yeast to sudden relief of glucose limitation.

Kresnowati MT, van Winden WA, Almering MJ, ten Pierick A, Ras C, Knijnenburg TA, Daran-Lapujade P, Pronk JT, Heijnen JJ, Daran JM.

Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:49.

12.

Transcriptional response of steady-state yeast cultures to transient perturbations in carbon source.

Ronen M, Botstein D.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):389-94.

13.

Transcriptomic profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to quinine reveals a glucose limitation response attributable to drug-induced inhibition of glucose uptake.

dos Santos SC, Tenreiro S, Palma M, Becker J, Sá-Correia I.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Dec;53(12):5213-23. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00794-09.

14.

Transcriptomic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for its adaptation to sulphuric acid-induced stress.

de Lucena RM, Elsztein C, de Barros Pita W, de Souza RB, de Sá Leitão Paiva Júnior S, de Morais Junior MA.

Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Nov;108(5):1147-60. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0568-2.

PMID:
26362331
15.

An integrative analysis of transcriptomic response of ethanol tolerant strains to ethanol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Kasavi C, Eraslan S, Oner ET, Kirdar B.

Mol Biosyst. 2016 Feb;12(2):464-76. doi: 10.1039/c5mb00622h.

PMID:
26661334
16.

Time course gene expression profiling of yeast spore germination reveals a network of transcription factors orchestrating the global response.

Geijer C, Pirkov I, Vongsangnak W, Ericsson A, Nielsen J, Krantz M, Hohmann S.

BMC Genomics. 2012 Oct 15;13:554. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-554.

17.
18.

Refining current knowledge on the yeast FLR1 regulatory network by combined experimental and computational approaches.

Teixeira MC, Dias PJ, Monteiro PT, Sala A, Oliveira AL, Freitas AT, Sá-Correia I.

Mol Biosyst. 2010 Dec;6(12):2471-81. doi: 10.1039/c004881j.

PMID:
20938527
19.
20.

Comparative proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different nitrogen sources.

Zhao S, Zhao X, Zou H, Fu J, Du G, Zhou J, Chen J.

J Proteomics. 2014 Apr 14;101:102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.01.031.

PMID:
24530623

Supplemental Content

Support Center