Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Explicit expectations and the effects of prevalence.

Wolfe JM.

Radiology. 2011 Oct;261(1):328; author reply 328-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111247. No abstract available.

PMID:
21931146
2.

Changing radiologists' expectations: false information versus years of experience.

Larson DB.

Radiology. 2011 Oct;261(1):327; author reply 327-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110794. No abstract available.

PMID:
21931145
3.

The effect of abnormality-prevalence expectation on expert observer performance and visual search.

Reed WM, Ryan JT, McEntee MF, Evanoff MG, Brennan PC.

Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):938-43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101090.

PMID:
21248231
4.

Viewing another person's eye movements improves identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray inspection.

Litchfield D, Ball LJ, Donovan T, Manning DJ, Crawford T.

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Sep;16(3):251-62. doi: 10.1037/a0020082.

PMID:
20853985
5.

One less bias to worry about.

Obuchowski NA.

Radiology. 2004 Jul;232(1):302. No abstract available.

PMID:
15220512
6.

How to evaluate lung fields on the neonatal chest x-ray film.

Trotter C.

Neonatal Netw. 2000 Mar;19(2):43-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
11948998
7.

Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph.

Manning DJ, Ethell SC, Donovan T.

Br J Radiol. 2004 Mar;77(915):231-5.

PMID:
15020365
8.

Can prevalence expectations drive radiologists' behavior?

Reed WM, Chow SL, Chew LE, Brennan PC.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Apr;21(4):450-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.12.002.

PMID:
24594414
9.

What can cytologists learn from 25 years of investigations in visual search?

Evered A.

Br J Biomed Sci. 2005;62(4):182-92; quiz 1 p following 200. Review.

PMID:
16411379
10.
11.

Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs.

Samuel S, Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Toto LC.

Radiology. 1995 Mar;194(3):895-902.

PMID:
7862998
12.

The chest radiograph.

Jankharia B.

Natl Med J India. 2006 Sep-Oct;19(5):267-73. No abstract available.

PMID:
17203683
13.

Chest radiography of acute paediatric lower respiratory infections: experience versus interobserver variation.

Levinsky Y, Mimouni FB, Fisher D, Ehrlichman M.

Acta Paediatr. 2013 Jul;102(7):e310-4. doi: 10.1111/apa.12249.

PMID:
23565882
14.

Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images.

Kundel HL, La Follette PS Jr.

Radiology. 1972 Jun;103(3):523-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
5022947
15.

Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography.

Kroft LJ, Veldkamp WJ, Mertens BJ, van Delft JP, Geleijns J.

Radiology. 2006 Nov;241(2):392-8.

PMID:
17057066
16.

Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions.

Brogdon BG, Kelsey CA, Moseley RD Jr.

Radiol Clin North Am. 1983 Dec;21(4):633-54.

PMID:
6657962
17.

Observer variation in classifying chest radiographs for small lung opacities and pleural abnormalities in a population sample.

Impivaara O, Zitting AJ, Kuusela T, Alanen E, Karjalainen A.

Am J Ind Med. 1998 Sep;34(3):261-5.

PMID:
9698995
18.

Thin-section CT of the lungs: eye-tracking analysis of the visual approach to reading tiled and stacked display formats.

Ellis SM, Hu X, Dempere-Marco L, Yang GZ, Wells AU, Hansell DM.

Eur J Radiol. 2006 Aug;59(2):257-64.

PMID:
16829011
19.

[Findings of digital intensive or bed lung radiographs at the monitor vs. hard copy: a clinical ROC study].

Pärtan G, Mosser H, Tekusch A, Urban M, Augustin I, Hruby W.

Rofo. 1994 Oct;161(4):354-60. German.

PMID:
7948983
20.

Postmortem chest radiography.

Saliba NA, Maya G, Leguizamon C, Pal E, Goldin AG.

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969 Jun;99(6):903-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
5787604
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center