Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 169

1.

Usability and preference evaluation of a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism by people with diabetes and healthcare professionals.

Bailey T, Thurman J, Niemeyer M, Schmeisl G.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):2043-52. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.616190. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

PMID:
21916529
2.

Ease of use and preference of a new versus widely available prefilled insulin pen assessed by people with diabetes, physicians and nurses.

Oyer D, Narendran P, Qvist M, Niemeyer M, Nadeau DA.

Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011 Oct;8(10):1259-69. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2011.615830. Epub 2011 Sep 12.

PMID:
21905942
3.

Healthcare professional and patient assessment of a new prefilled insulin pen versus two widely available prefilled insulin pens for ease of use, teaching and learning.

Nadeau DA, Campos C, Niemeyer M, Bailey T.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):3-13. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.644427. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

PMID:
22114905
4.

Usability and preference assessment of a new prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe in people with diabetes, physicians and nurses.

Campos C, Lajara R, Deluzio T.

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Sep;13(13):1837-46. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.713350. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

PMID:
22873943
5.

Preference for a new prefilled insulin pen compared with the original pen.

Garg S, Bailey T, DeLuzio T, Pollom D.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Dec;27(12):2323-33. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.630721. Epub 2011 Oct 31.

PMID:
21988614
6.

Healthcare professional and patient perceptions of a new prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe.

Lajara R, Guerrero G, Thurman J.

Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012 Oct;9(10):1181-96. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

PMID:
22971161
7.

Assessment for ease of use and preference of a new prefilled insulin pen (FlexTouch Degludec U100/U200) versus the SoloSTAR insulin pen by patients with diabetes and healthcare professionals.

Pfützner A, Forst T, Niemeyer M, Bailey T.

Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014 Sep;11(9):1381-9. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.927438. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

PMID:
24921223
8.

Accuracy and preference assessment of prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe with diabetes patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.

Pfützner A, Bailey T, Campos C, Kahn D, Ambers E, Niemeyer M, Guerrero G, Klonoff D, Nayberg I.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 May;29(5):475-81. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.775112. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

PMID:
23402225
10.

Patient acceptance and reliability of new Humulin/Humalog 3.0 ml prefilled insulin pen in ten Croatian diabetes centres.

Sucic M, Galic E, Cabrijan T, Ivandic A, Petrusic A, Wyatt J, Mincheva N, Milicevic Z, Malone J.

Med Sci Monit. 2002 Mar;8(3):PI21-6.

PMID:
11884952
11.

Patient device assessment evaluation of two insulin injection devices in a mixed cohort of insulin-treated patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Schipper C, Musholt P, Niemeyer M, Qvist M, Löffler A, Forst T, Pfützner A.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Aug;28(8):1297-303. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.708325. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

PMID:
22746353
13.

Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens.

Clark PE, Valentine V, Bodie JN, Sarwat S.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jul;26(7):1745-53. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.489028.

PMID:
20482243
14.

Usability of a pre-filled insulin injection device in a 3-month observational survey of everyday clinical practice in Australia.

Carter J, Roberts A.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Oct;24(10):2741-9. doi: 10.1185/03007990802367579 . Epub 2008 Aug 19.

PMID:
18715525
15.

FlexTouch® for the delivery of insulin: technical attributes and perception among patients and healthcare professionals.

Bailey T, Campos C.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 May;9(3):209-17. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.13. Epub 2012 Apr 3. Review.

PMID:
22471783
16.

Safety, simplicity and convenience of a modified prefilled insulin pen.

Sommavilla B, Jørgensen C, Jensen Kh.

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Sep;9(13):2223-32. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.13.2223 . Erratum in: Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Jan;10(1):153.

PMID:
18710348
17.

Intuitiveness, instruction time, and patient acceptance of a prefilled insulin delivery device and a reusable insulin delivery device in a randomized, open-label, crossover handling study in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Reimer T, Hohberg C, Pfützner AH, Jørgensen C, Jensen KH, Pfützner A.

Clin Ther. 2008 Dec;30(12):2252-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.004.

PMID:
19167585
18.

Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers.

Summers KH, Szeinbach SL, Lenox SM.

Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1498-505.

PMID:
15531012
19.

Comparative glycemic control, safety and patient ratings for a new 4 mm x 32G insulin pen needle in adults with diabetes.

Hirsch LJ, Gibney MA, Albanese J, Qu S, Kassler-Taub K, Klaff LJ, Bailey TS.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jun;26(6):1531-41. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.482499.

PMID:
20429832
20.

Patient and physician satisfaction with the Humulin/Humalog Pen, a new 3.0-mL prefilled pen device for insulin delivery.

Bohannon NJ, Ohannesian JP, Burdan AL, Holcombe JH, Zagar A.

Clin Ther. 2000 Sep;22(9):1049-67.

PMID:
11048904

Supplemental Content

Support Center