Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 55

1.

Pitfalls in the use of DGV for CNV interpretation.

Duclos A, Charbonnier F, Chambon P, Latouche JB, Blavier A, Redon R, Frébourg T, Flaman JM.

Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Oct;155A(10):2593-6. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34195. Epub 2011 Sep 9. No abstract available.

PMID:
21910227
2.

[Detection of cryptic copy number variations in a fetus with congenital heart disease by array-based comparative genomic hybridization].

HU P, WANG Y, JI XQ, LIN Y, Li L, ZHOU XY, CHEN J, MA DY, CAO L, Xu Z.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Apr;28(2):133-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2011.02.003. Chinese.

PMID:
21462121
3.

Current analysis platforms and methods for detecting copy number variation.

Li W, Olivier M.

Physiol Genomics. 2013 Jan 7;45(1):1-16. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00082.2012. Epub 2012 Nov 6. Review.

4.

Exploring copy number variation in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) genome by array comparative genome hybridization.

Fontanesi L, Martelli PL, Scotti E, Russo V, Rogel-Gaillard C, Casadio R, Vernesi C.

Genomics. 2012 Oct;100(4):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

5.

[Current limitations and difficulties in application of microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis].

Chen Y, Choy KW.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;28(1):47-51. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2011.01.011. Review. Chinese.

PMID:
21287509
6.

Analysis of copy number variants in the cattle genome.

Kijas JW, Barendse W, Barris W, Harrison B, McCulloch R, McWilliam S, Whan V.

Gene. 2011 Aug 15;482(1-2):73-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 May 18.

PMID:
21620936
7.

Mutation and copy number analysis in paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia families.

Ono S, Yoshiura K, Kurotaki N, Kikuchi T, Niikawa N, Kinoshita A.

Mov Disord. 2011 Mar;26(4):761-3. doi: 10.1002/mds.23475. Epub 2011 Feb 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
21312274
8.

Detection and interpretation of genomic structural variation in health and disease.

Vandeweyer G, Kooy RF.

Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013 Jan;13(1):61-82. doi: 10.1586/erm.12.119. Review.

PMID:
23256704
9.

Copy number changes of CNV regions in intersubspecific crosses of the house mouse.

Scavetta RJ, Tautz D.

Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1845-56. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq064. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

PMID:
20200126
10.

Errors in the interpretation of copy number variations due to the use of public databases as a reference.

Bastida-Lertxundi N, López-López E, Piñán MA, Puiggros A, Navajas A, Solé F, García-Orad A.

Cancer Genet. 2014 Apr;207(4):164-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

PMID:
24767712
11.

CNV detection method optimized for high-resolution arrayCGH by normality test.

Ahn J, Yoon Y, Park C, Park S.

Comput Biol Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.12.015. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

PMID:
22270227
12.

Copy number imbalances detected with a BAC-based array comparative genomic hybridization platform in congenital diaphragmatic hernia fetuses.

Machado IN, Heinrich JK, Barini R, Peralta CF.

Genet Mol Res. 2011 Feb 15;10(1):261-7. doi: 10.4238/vol10-1gmr1001.

13.

A first comparative map of copy number variations in the sheep genome.

Fontanesi L, Beretti F, Martelli PL, Colombo M, Dall'olio S, Occidente M, Portolano B, Casadio R, Matassino D, Russo V.

Genomics. 2011 Mar;97(3):158-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Nov 24.

14.

VEGA: variational segmentation for copy number detection.

Morganella S, Cerulo L, Viglietto G, Ceccarelli M.

Bioinformatics. 2010 Dec 15;26(24):3020-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq586. Epub 2010 Oct 19.

PMID:
20959380
15.

Introductory comments on special section-genomic microduplications: When adding may equal subtracting.

Bacino CA, Cheung SW.

Am J Med Genet A. 2010 May;152A(5):1063-5. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33346.

PMID:
20425812
16.

Genome-wide high-resolution screening in Dupuytren's disease reveals common regions of DNA copy number alterations.

Shih BB, Tassabehji M, Watson JS, McGrouther AD, Bayat A.

J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jul;35(7):1172-1183.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

PMID:
20561756
17.

Evaluation of the efficacy of constitutional array-based comparative genomic hybridization in the diagnosis of aneuploidy using genomic and amplified DNA.

Tan NH, Palmer R, Wang R.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Feb;36(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01110.x.

PMID:
20178523
18.

[Genetic and molecular biology techniques for the analysis of hereditary colorectal cancer].

Castellví-Bel S, Castells A.

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jun-Jul;28(6):354-60. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
15989818
19.

Genetic profiles distinguish different types of hereditary ovarian cancer.

Domanska K, Malander S, Staaf J, Karlsson A, Borg A, Jönsson G, Nilbert M.

Oncol Rep. 2010 Oct;24(4):885-95.

PMID:
20811668
20.

Tumor heterogeneity in a follicular carcinoma of thyroid: a study by comparative genomic hybridization.

Da Silva L, James D, Simpson PT, Walker D, Vargas AC, Jayanthan J, Lakhani SR, McNicol AM.

Endocr Pathol. 2011 Jun;22(2):103-7. doi: 10.1007/s12022-011-9154-y.

PMID:
21499728

Supplemental Content

Support Center