Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 141

1.

An independent review and prioritization of past radionuclide and chemical releases from the Los Alamos National Laboratory--implications for future dose reconstruction studies.

Le MH, Buddenbaum JE, Burns RE Jr, Shonka JJ, Gaffney SH, Donovan EP, Flack SM, Widner TE.

J Environ Monit. 2011 Oct;13(10):2735-47. doi: 10.1039/c1em10374a. Epub 2011 Sep 9. Review.

PMID:
21904770
2.
3.

Risks to the public from historical releases of radionuclides and chemicals at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site.

Till JE, Rood AS, Voillequé PG, McGavran PD, Meyer KR, Grogan HA, Sinclair WK, Aanenson JW, Meyer HR, Mohler HJ, Rope SK, Case MJ.

J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002 Sep;12(5):355-72.

4.

Application of NCRP air screening factors for evaluating both routine and episodic radionuclide releases to the atmosphere.

Mohler HJ, Meyer KR, Grogan HA, Aanenson JW, Till JE.

Health Phys. 2004 Feb;86(2):135-44.

PMID:
14744046
5.

Radionuclides in deer and elk from Los Alamos National Laboratory and the doses to humans from the ingestion of muscle and bone.

Fresquez PR, Biggs JR, Bennett KD, Kraig DH, Mullen MA, Ferenbaugh JK.

J Environ Sci Health B. 1999 Sep;34(5):901-15.

PMID:
10466109
6.
7.

Past radionuclide releases from routine operations at Rocky Flats.

Ripple SR, Widner TE, Mongan TR.

Health Phys. 1996 Oct;71(4):502-9.

PMID:
8830751
8.

A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.

Boice JD Jr, Leggett RW, Ellis ED, Wallace PW, Mumma M, Cohen SS, Brill AB, Chadda B, Boecker BB, Yoder RC, Eckerman KF.

Health Phys. 2006 May;90(5):409-30.

PMID:
16607174
9.

Radiological effluents released by U.S. commercial nuclear power plants from 1995-2005.

Harris JT, Miller DW.

Health Phys. 2008 Dec;95(6):734-43. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000324201.89669.30.

PMID:
19001900
10.
11.

Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.

Moeller DW, Ryan MT, Sun LS.

Health Phys. 2007 Feb;92(2):127-33. Review.

PMID:
17220714
13.

Modeling aeolian transport of soil-bound plutonium: considering infrequent but normal environmental disturbances is critical in estimating future dose.

Michelotti EA, Whicker JJ, Eisele WF, Breshears DD, Kirchner TB.

J Environ Radioact. 2013 Jun;120:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

PMID:
23455230
14.

Ambient environmental profile for the Savannah River Site.

Rollins EM.

Health Phys. 2008 Jul;95(1):55-68. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000265217.20406.c7.

PMID:
18545030
15.

An independent evaluation of plutonium body burdens in populations near Los Alamos Laboratory using human autopsy data.

Gaffney SH, Donovan EP, Shonka JJ, Le MH, Widner TE.

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013 Jun;216(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 15.

PMID:
23078914
17.

Radiological risk from consuming fish and wildlife to Native Americans on the Hanford Site (USA).

Delistraty D, Van Verst S, Rochette EA.

Environ Res. 2010 Feb;110(2):169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.10.013. Epub 2009 Nov 22.

PMID:
19932474
18.
19.

Evaluation of continuous air monitor placement in a plutonium facility.

Whicker JJ, Rodgers JC, Fairchild CI, Scripsick RC, Lopez RC.

Health Phys. 1997 May;72(5):734-43.

PMID:
9106715
20.

Overview of the Fernald Dosimetry Reconstruction Project and source term estimates for 1951-1988.

Meyer KR, Voillequé PG, Schmidt DW, Rope SK, Killough GG, Shleien B, Moore RE, Case MJ, Till JE.

Health Phys. 1996 Oct;71(4):425-37.

PMID:
8830745

Supplemental Content

Support Center