Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Optimal medical therapy for coronary artery disease in 2011 - perspectives from the STICH Trial.

Whayne TF, Saha SP, Quevedo K, Mukherjee D.

Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2011 Oct;9(4):269-76. Review.

PMID:
21902655
2.

API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.

Association of Physicians of India.

J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80. Review.

PMID:
16909697
3.

Different treatment options in chronic coronary artery disease: when is it the time for medical treatment, percutaneous coronary intervention or aortocoronary bypass surgery?

Russ M, Werdan K, Cremer J, Krian A, Meinertz T, Zerkowski HR.

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Apr;106(15):253-61. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0253. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

4.

Ten-year outcomes of patients randomized to surgery, angioplasty, or medical treatment for stable multivessel coronary disease: effect of age in the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study II trial.

Rezende PC, Hueb W, Garzillo CL, Lima EG, Hueb AC, Ramires JA, Kalil Filho R.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

6.

Impact of optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term cardiovascular end points in patients with stable coronary artery disease (from the COURAGE Trial).

Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Maron DJ, Hartigan PM, Sedlis SP, Dada M, Labedi M, Spertus JA, Kostuk WJ, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Chaitman BR, Mancini GB, Weintraub WS; COURAGE Trial Investigators.

Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 1;104(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.059. Epub 2009 Apr 16.

PMID:
19576311
7.

Cardiac complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Julien J.

J Diabetes Complications. 1997 Mar-Apr;11(2):123-30. Review.

PMID:
9101398
8.
9.

The rationale and design of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial.

Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, O'Connor CM, Oh JK, Bonow RO, Pohost GM, Feldman AM, Mark DB, Panza JA, Sopko G, Rouleau JL, Jones RH; STICH Investigators.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Dec;134(6):1540-7.

10.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Pursnani S, Korley F, Gopaul R, Kanade P, Chandra N, Shaw RE, Bangalore S.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;5(4):476-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.970954. Epub 2012 Aug 7. Review.

11.

Clinical evidence versus patients' perception of coronary revascularization.

Kawasuji M.

Surg Today. 2013 Apr;43(4):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0467-3. Epub 2013 Jan 3. Review.

PMID:
23283351
12.

Management and outcome of patients with established coronary artery disease: the Euro Heart Survey on coronary revascularization.

Lenzen MJ, Boersma E, Bertrand ME, Maier W, Moris C, Piscione F, Sechtem U, Stahle E, Widimsky P, de Jaegere P, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Mercado N, Wijns W; European Society of Cardiology.

Eur Heart J. 2005 Jun;26(12):1169-79. Epub 2005 Mar 31.

PMID:
15802360
13.

Long-term outcomes after invasive management for older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Roe MT, Li S, Thomas L, Wang TY, Alexander KP, Ohman EM, Peterson ED.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):323-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000120. Epub 2013 May 7.

14.

One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials.

Mercado N, Wijns W, Serruys PW, Sigwart U, Flather MD, Stables RH, O'Neill WW, Rodriguez A, Lemos PA, Hueb WA, Gersh BJ, Booth J, Boersma E.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;130(2):512-9.

15.

Initial strategy of revascularization versus optimal medical therapy for improving outcomes in ischemic heart disease: a review of the literature.

Songco AV, Brener SJ.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012 Aug;14(4):397-407. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0278-6. Review.

PMID:
22555943
16.

A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting for proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Reeves BC, Angelini GD, Bryan AJ, Taylor FC, Cripps T, Spyt TJ, Samani NJ, Roberts JA, Jacklin P, Seehra HK, Culliford LA, Keenan DJ, Rowlands DJ, Clarke B, Stanbridge R, Foale R.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Apr;8(16):1-43.

17.

The heart failure challenge: optimizing medical and surgical management.

Racine N, Rouleau JL.

Can J Cardiol. 2006 Aug;22 Suppl C:8C-12C. Review.

18.

[Coronary angioplasty in elderly patients].

Liistro F, Colombo A.

Ital Heart J Suppl. 2002 Jan;3(1):1-8. Review. Italian.

PMID:
11899566
19.

No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: the best bypass surgery trial.

Møller CH, Perko MJ, Lund JT, Andersen LW, Kelbaek H, Madsen JK, Winkel P, Gluud C, Steinbrüchel DA.

Circulation. 2010 Feb 2;121(4):498-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.880443. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

20.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.

Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Ståhle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, Van Dyck N, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW; SYNTAX Investigators.

N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 7;368(6):584.

Supplemental Content

Support Center